eCite Digital Repository
Maternal choices and preferences for screening strategies of gestational diabetes mellitus: an exploratory study using discrete choice experiment
Citation
Xu, T and Jing, Y and Guo, X and Campbell, JA and Ahmad, H and Xia, Q and Lai, X and Yan, D and Ma, L and Fang, H and Palmer, AJ, Maternal choices and preferences for screening strategies of gestational diabetes mellitus: an exploratory study using discrete choice experiment, Frontiers in Public Health, 10 Article 864482. ISSN 2296-2565 (2022) [Refereed Article]
![]() | PDF (Fully published version) 285Kb |
Copyright Statement
© 2022 Xu, Jiang, Guo, Campbell, Ahmad, Xia, Lai, Yan, Ma, Fang and Palmer. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0) . https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
DOI: doi:10.3389/fpubh.2022.864482
Abstract
Aims:This study aimed to investigate maternal preferences for gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM) screening options in rural China to identify an optimal GDM screening strategy.
Methods: Pregnant women at 24–28 gestational weeks were recruited from Shandong province, China. A discrete choice experiment (DCE) was conducted to elicit pregnant women’s preferences for GDM screening strategy defined by five attributes: number of blood draws, out-of-pocket costs, screening waiting-time, number of hospital visits, and positive diagnosis rate. A mixed logistic model was employed to quantify maternal preferences, and to estimate the relative importance of included attributes in determining pregnant women’s preferences for two routinely applied screening strategies ("one-step": 75 g oral glucose tolerance test [OGTT] and "two-step": 50 g glucose challenge-test plus 75 g OGTT). Preference heterogeneity was also investigated.
Results:N = 287 participants completed the DCE survey. All five predefined attributes were associated with pregnant women’s preferences. Diagnostic rate was the most influential attribute (17.5 vs. 8.0%, OR: 2.89; 95%CI: 2.10 to 3.96). When changes of the attributes of "two-step" to "one-step" strategies, women’s uptake probability from full "two-step" to "one-step" significantly increased with 71.3% (95%CI: 52.2 to 90.1%), but no significant difference with the first of "two-step" (−31.0%, 95%CI: −70.2 to 8.1%).
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | diabetes, gestational diabetes, public health, health systems |
Research Division: | Biomedical and Clinical Sciences |
Research Group: | Clinical sciences |
Research Field: | Endocrinology |
Objective Division: | Health |
Objective Group: | Public health (excl. specific population health) |
Objective Field: | Public health (excl. specific population health) not elsewhere classified |
UTAS Author: | Campbell, JA (Dr Julie Campbell) |
UTAS Author: | Ahmad, H (Dr Hasnat Ahmad) |
UTAS Author: | Xia, Q (Miss Qing Xia) |
UTAS Author: | Palmer, AJ (Professor Andrew Palmer) |
ID Code: | 154233 |
Year Published: | 2022 |
Deposited By: | Menzies Institute for Medical Research |
Deposited On: | 2022-11-15 |
Last Modified: | 2022-12-08 |
Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page