eCite Digital Repository

Resilience in animal care professions: does the stress shield model fit?

Citation

Cushing, N and Meehan, C and Norris, K, Resilience in animal care professions: does the stress shield model fit?, Australian Veterinary Journal, 100, (10) pp. 513-525. ISSN 1751-0813 (2022) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF (Published Version)
5Mb

Preview
PDF (Published version)
400Kb

Copyright Statement

2022 The Authors, Australian Veterinary Journal published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Australian Veterinary Association. This is an open access article under the therms of the Creative Commons Attribution License. Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

DOI: doi:10.1111/avj.13193

Abstract

Animal care professionals can experience adverse psychological outcomes due to their work, therefore research exploring supporting resilience in this population is needed. This study investigated the capacity of the Stress Shield Model (SSM) to explain relationships between individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors with outcomes in resilience (resilience, growth, and job satisfaction) in animal care professionals. Empowerment was hypothesised to mediate these relationships. Australian and New Zealand animal care professionals (N = 393) completed an online survey measuring conscientiousness, coping, team and leader relationships, job demands, organisational resources, empowerment, growth, resilience, and job satisfaction. Results indicated that SSM can partially explain relationships between individual, interpersonal, and organisational factors and outcomes in resilience, and empowerment partially mediated the effect of organisational resources on growth. Problem-approach coping positively predicted resilience and growth; conversely, emotion-avoidant coping negatively predicted these outcomes. Conscientiousness positively predicted resilience and negatively predicted job satisfaction. Team relationships positively predicted growth and resilience, while leader-member relationships positively predicted job satisfaction. Organisational resources positively predicted resilience, growth, and job satisfaction, conversely, job demands predicted reductions across these outcomes. Findings indicate supporting resilience in animal care professionals requires fostering individual, interpersonal, and organisational resources.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:animal carers; organisational psychology; resilience; stress shield model; workplace stress
Research Division:Psychology
Research Group:Applied and developmental psychology
Research Field:Industrial and organisational psychology (incl. human factors)
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Specific population health (excl. Indigenous health)
Objective Field:Occupational health
UTAS Author:Cushing, N (Miss Nicole Cushing)
UTAS Author:Meehan, C (Dr Crystal Meehan)
UTAS Author:Norris, K (Professor Kimberley Norris)
ID Code:153535
Year Published:2022
Deposited By:Psychology
Deposited On:2022-09-23
Last Modified:2022-11-23
Downloads:2 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page