Steel, A and Redmond, R and Schloss, J and Cramer, H and Goldenberg, J and Leach, MJ and Harnett, JE and Van de Venter, C and McLintock, A and Bradley, R and Hawrelak, JA and Cooley, K and Leung, J and Wardle, J, International prevalence of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner: a systematic review and meta-analysis, BMJ open, 12, (7) Article e056075. ISSN 2044-6055 (2022) [Refereed Article]
|PDF (Published version)|
© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial.
Official URL: https://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/12/7/e056075.citat...
Objectives:Naturopathy is a traditional medicine system informed by codified philosophies and principles, and an emphasis on non-pharmacologic therapeutic interventions. While naturopathy is practised by approximately 75 000-100 000 000 naturopathic practitioners in at least 98 countries, little is known about the international prevalence of history of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner. This study reports a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies describing the global prevalence of history of consultation with a naturopathic practitioner by the general population.
Setting:The included literature was identified through a systematic search of eight databases between September and October 2019, as well as the grey literature.
Participants:Studies were included if they reported the prevalence rate of consultations with a naturopathic practitioner by the general population.
Interventions:Survey items needed to report consultations with a naturopathic practitioner as defined in the country where data was collected, and not combine naturopathic consultations with other health services or only report consulations for illness populations.
Primary and secondary outcome measures:: Primary measures used for the analysis was consultations in the previous 12 months. Other prevalence timeframes were reported as secondary measures.
Methods:Meta-analysis of prevalence data was conducted using random effects models based on individual countries and WHO world regions.
Results:The literature search identified eight manuscripts summarising 14 studies reporting prevalence for inclusion in the review. All included studies had a low risk of bias. Meta-analysis of the included studies by world region found the 12-month prevalence of history of naturopathy consultations ranged from 1% in the Region of the Americas to 6% in the European and Western Pacific Regions.
Conclusion:There are up to sixfold differences in the prevalence of naturopathy consults over 12 months between and within world regions, which may be driven by a range of policy, legislative and social factors.
|Item Type:||Refereed Article|
|Keywords:||naturopathy; complementary medicine; prevalence of use|
|Research Division:||Health Sciences|
|Research Group:||Traditional, complementary and integrative medicine|
|Objective Group:||Evaluation of health and support services|
|Objective Field:||Health education and promotion|
|UTAS Author:||Hawrelak, JA (Dr Jason Hawrelak)|
|Downloads:||2 View Download Statistics|
Repository Staff Only: item control page