The quantity of urban forests in cities is critical for biodiversity conservation and human health, and is known to be distributed unequally. Increasingly, the quality of urban forests are also being recognised as shaping the benefits they provide. Previous studies and reviews have demonstrated that the quality of urban green spaces is associated with patterns of inequality as measured by socio-economic status and race (in the U.S). This study extends this body of knowledge to urban forests by systematically reviewing the urban forest literature (that explicitly study the urban forest) exploring the relationship between urban forest quality and both socio-economic status and race. Two academic databases (SCOPUS and Web of Science) were systematically searched. A total of 2012 papers were screened and 21 articles were included in this study. Almost all studies (20/21) found evidence of inequality, with at least one significant association between measures of urban forest quality and socio-economic status or race. However, 6 studies found contrasting patterns, with lower socioeconomic status areas having higher urban forest quality. There was variation in the type of 'urban forest' studied, and variation in the ways both urban forest quality and socio-economic status were measured, making inter-study comparisons difficult. Interestingly, the literature was geographically diverse, and future research could continue to focus on countries in Africa, South America and Asia with diverse needs for and uses of urban forests. In conclusion, this review finds evidence for inequity in the distribution of urban forest quality. Future research that more clearly describes the urban forests being studied and that explores sociocultural variation in perceived quality would allow better generalisation and understanding of forest quality patterns.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Keywords:	environmental justice, urban, woodlands, forest, socio-economic status, income, race
Research Division:	Built Environment and Design
Research Group:	Design
Research Field:	Sustainable design
Objective Division:	Health
Objective Group:	Evaluation of health and support services
Objective Field:	Health inequalities
UTAS Author:	Allegretto, G (Miss Gabriella Allegretto)
UTAS Author:	Kendal, D (Dr Dave Kendal)
UTAS Author:	Flies, EJ (Dr Emily Flies)
ID Code:	153180
Year Published:	2022
Web of Science® Times Cited:	1
Deposited By:	Plant Science
Deposited On:	2022-09-12
Last Modified:	2022-12-11
Downloads:	0