eCite Digital Repository

Life at the academic coalface: validation of a holistic academic workload estimation tool

Citation

Kenny, J and Fluck, AE, Life at the academic coalface: validation of a holistic academic workload estimation tool, Higher Education pp. 1-20. ISSN 0882-4126 (2022) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF (Online first)
675Kb
  

Copyright Statement

© The Author(s) 2022. This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.

DOI: doi:10.1007/s10734-022-00912-x

Abstract

This paper reports on research exploring the academic workload and performance practices of Australian universities. This research has identified a suite of activities associated with teaching, research and service, each with an associated time value (allocation). This led to the development of the academic workload estimation tool (AWET). In 2020, to validate the findings, we contacted academics willing to participate further and conducted interviews. We used the AWET to estimate workload for each individual for the previous year and compared it to the workload allocated according to their institutional workload model. Discrepancies were then discussed to ascertain to what extent the AWET was able to capture their work. In general, the participants thought the AWET provided a more realistic estimate of their actual work and highlighted how much is underestimated or unaccounted for by the workload models used within their institutions. It also showed how academic performance policies, focussed primarily on research output, disadvantaged many individuals because they ignored or minimised many scholarly, teaching and service-related tasks inherent in the academic role. Overall, the findings showed the AWET was a useful tool to discuss academic work and assisted them to better capture the complexity and extent of what they did. We offer the AWET as a validated approach for academics to estimate their workload in a holistic and transparent manner. We suggest its implementation institution-wide, along with an aligned performance policy, will facilitate negotiation of reasonable performance expectations. This will rebuild trust in the processes and improve a university's effectiveness.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:academic workload, academic performance , estimating academic work
Research Division:Education
Research Group:Education systems
Research Field:Education systems not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:Economic Framework
Objective Group:Management and productivity
Objective Field:Management
UTAS Author:Kenny, J (Associate Professor John Kenny)
UTAS Author:Fluck, AE (Associate Professor Andrew Fluck)
ID Code:152268
Year Published:2022
Deposited By:Education
Deposited On:2022-08-16
Last Modified:2022-09-20
Downloads:1 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page