eCite Digital Repository

Agronomic and on-farm infrastructure adaptations to manage economic risk in Australian irrigated broadacre systems: A case study

Citation

Monjardino, M and Harrison, MT and DeVoil, P and Rodriguez, D and Sadras, VO, Agronomic and on-farm infrastructure adaptations to manage economic risk in Australian irrigated broadacre systems: A case study, Agricultural Water Management, 269 Article 107740. ISSN 0378-3774 (2022) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy
2Mb

Preview
PDF
Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy
3Mb

DOI: doi:10.1016/j.agwat.2022.107740

Abstract

Context: Irrigated agriculture is critical to feeding a growing global population. Irrigation contributes 30% of agricultural gross value in Australia, but water scarcity and the volatility of Australia’s open water market are significant challenges.

Objective: In this paper we advance a context-specific, system-based approach that aims to identify financially feasible irrigation designs and decision making, with the goal to increase water productivity, whole-farm profitability, and risk management.

Methods: We use a new analytical framework that combines crop simulation, discounted cash flow, system profit gap, probability theory and risk aversion analysis to quantify economic risk and compare 16 adaptation scenarios in an irrigated broadacre farm of the Riverina region in Australia. The scenarios result from the factorial of four agronomic systems (Baseline/Current, Diversified, Intensified, Simplified) and four irrigation methods − including surface irrigation by gravity (Flood) and by pumps (Pipe & Riser), pressurised irrigation by overhead spray (Pivot) and micro-dosing (Drip).

Results and conclusions: A system profit gap of ~$10 M was quantified for the irrigated farm area over 30 years. Relative to the Baseline – flood-irrigated wheat-canola − significant long-term profit gains were identified for the Intensified (mean 273%) and Diversified (mean 80%) scenarios. Current and Simplified scenarios were less profitable than the Baseline (mean -16% and -37%, respectively). The benefits of intensification were accrued from large gains in crop gross margins - especially cotton yields - that consistently offset the set-up costs and additional water use. Diversification was superior in mitigating economic risk due to higher returns per ML of irrigated water and more diverse sources of income. Under the assumptions in our study, agronomic system had greater relative influence on financial performance than irrigation infrastructure.

Significance: We demonstrated the potential to inform investment decisions from improving our understanding of trade-offs between profits and risks in the face of high climate variability, market volatility and Australia’s open water market.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:profit gap, downside risk, risk aversion, irrigation, investment, water price
Research Division:Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Research Group:Agriculture, land and farm management
Research Field:Agricultural land management
Objective Division:Plant Production and Plant Primary Products
Objective Group:Environmentally sustainable plant production
Objective Field:Management of water consumption by plant production
UTAS Author:Harrison, MT (Associate Professor Matthew Harrison)
ID Code:150094
Year Published:2022
Deposited By:TIA - Research Institute
Deposited On:2022-05-20
Last Modified:2022-07-25
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page