University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Religious but not ethical: the effects of extrinsic religiosity, ethnocentrism and self-righteousness on consumers' ethical judgments

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-21, 06:14 authored by Denni ArliDenni Arli, Septianto, F, Chowdhury, RMMI
The current research investigates how religiosity can influence unethicality in a consumption context. In particular, considering the link between extrinsic religious orientations and unethicality, this research clarifies why and when extrinsic religiosity leads to unethical decisions. Across two studies, findings show that ethnocentrism is both a mediator (Study 1) and a moderator (Studies 1 and 2) of the effects of extrinsic religiosity on consumers' ethical judgments. This is because extrinsic religiosity leads to ethnocentrism, and in-group loyalty manifested through ethnocentrism increases support for unethical consumer actions, thus establishing ethnocentrism as a mediator. At the same time, different levels of ethnocentrism can also influence how extrinsic religiosity leads to supporting unethical consumption via self-righteousness, thus establishing ethnocentrism as a moderator. The findings from this research have significant implications for diverse stakeholders who have an interest in religiosity and consumer behavior.

History

Publication title

Journal of Business Ethics

Volume

171

Issue

316

Pagination

295-316

ISSN

0167-4544

Department/School

TSBE

Publisher

Kluwer Academic Publ

Place of publication

Van Godewijckstraat 30, Dordrecht, Netherlands, 3311 Gz

Rights statement

Copyright 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Business ethics; Religion and society

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC