eCite Digital Repository
Rethinking participation in commons governance: political representation and participation
Citation
Fudge, M and Leith, P, Rethinking participation in commons governance: political representation and participation, Society and Natural Resources, 34, (8) pp. 1038-1055. ISSN 0894-1920 (2021) [Refereed Article]
Copyright Statement
Copyright 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC
DOI: doi:10.1080/08941920.2021.1931592
Abstract
Participatory practices are prominent strategies for increasing the legitimacy and effectiveness of resource commons governance. Despite increases in participatory practices legitimacy of such governance is in decline. Remaining commons are sites of conflict echoing wider disillusionment in democratic governance across mature liberal democracies. Much participatory governance literature argues that more involvement of citizens in deliberation and decision-making is the solution, turning away from representative practices to strengthen direct participation in commons governance. In this paper we draw on seminal work in political representation theory to examine legitimacy and political agency in participatory governance practices. We develop a conceptual lens drawing on key elements of: Hannah Pitkin’s The Concept of Representation; Michael Saward’s Representative Claim; and, Vivan Schmidt’s throughput model of legitimacy. The lens comprises three ‘conditions’ for analyzing how political agency of participants is constituted through institutional processes: authorization, dissent and exit, and accountability. We argue that this conceptual lens can serve the participatory turn in commons governance by enabling explicit consideration of the links between political participation and representation as foundations of democratic legitimacy.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | citizen participation, common pool resources,natural resource governance, stakeholders, political representation, legitimacy, democracy, institutional analysis, political participation, marine governance, institutional arrangements |
Research Division: | Human Society |
Research Group: | Political science |
Research Field: | Political theory and political philosophy |
Objective Division: | Environmental Management |
Objective Group: | Coastal and estuarine systems and management |
Objective Field: | Assessment and management of coastal and estuarine ecosystems |
UTAS Author: | Fudge, M (Dr Maree Fudge) |
UTAS Author: | Leith, P (Dr Peat Leith) |
ID Code: | 145981 |
Year Published: | 2021 |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 2 |
Deposited By: | TSBE |
Deposited On: | 2021-08-16 |
Last Modified: | 2021-09-14 |
Downloads: | 0 |
Repository Staff Only: item control page