eCite Digital Repository

Rethinking participation in commons governance: political representation and participation

Citation

Fudge, M and Leith, P, Rethinking participation in commons governance: political representation and participation, Society and Natural Resources, 34, (8) pp. 1038-1055. ISSN 0894-1920 (2021) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2021 Taylor & Francis Group, LLC

DOI: doi:10.1080/08941920.2021.1931592

Abstract

Participatory practices are prominent strategies for increasing the legitimacy and effectiveness of resource commons governance. Despite increases in participatory practices legitimacy of such governance is in decline. Remaining commons are sites of conflict echoing wider disillusionment in democratic governance across mature liberal democracies. Much participatory governance literature argues that more involvement of citizens in deliberation and decision-making is the solution, turning away from representative practices to strengthen direct participation in commons governance. In this paper we draw on seminal work in political representation theory to examine legitimacy and political agency in participatory governance practices. We develop a conceptual lens drawing on key elements of: Hannah Pitkin’s The Concept of Representation; Michael Saward’s Representative Claim; and, Vivan Schmidt’s throughput model of legitimacy. The lens comprises three ‘conditions’ for analyzing how political agency of participants is constituted through institutional processes: authorization, dissent and exit, and accountability. We argue that this conceptual lens can serve the participatory turn in commons governance by enabling explicit consideration of the links between political participation and representation as foundations of democratic legitimacy.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:citizen participation, common pool resources,natural resource governance, stakeholders, political representation, legitimacy, democracy, institutional analysis, political participation, marine governance, institutional arrangements
Research Division:Human Society
Research Group:Political science
Research Field:Political theory and political philosophy
Objective Division:Environmental Management
Objective Group:Coastal and estuarine systems and management
Objective Field:Assessment and management of coastal and estuarine ecosystems
UTAS Author:Fudge, M (Dr Maree Fudge)
UTAS Author:Leith, P (Dr Peat Leith)
ID Code:145981
Year Published:2021
Web of Science® Times Cited:1
Deposited By:TSBE
Deposited On:2021-08-16
Last Modified:2021-09-14
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page