University of Tasmania
Browse
145708 - Must MTA equate with delay.pdf (498.68 kB)

Must ‘MTA’ equate with ‘delay’? Material Transfer Agreements and institutional processes in Australian biomedical research

Download (498.68 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-21, 01:18 authored by Jane NielsenJane Nielsen, Dianne NicolDianne Nicol
The exchange of tangible materials remains essential to biomedical research, and has become increasingly formalised, including through use of Material Transfer Agreements (‘MTAs’). While MTAs provide comfort in clarifying legal relationships, they have not been without problems. Delays in the process of exchanging materials have reportedly epitomised the modern research environment. Most Australian research institutions now have offices dealing in technology transfer and business development (‘TTOs’). These offices employ combinations of legal, business and scientific experts. In this article, we explore the impact of TTO practices on the material transfer journey. We present qualitative evidence to demonstrate that resourcing and organisational processes, in addition to levels of experience in MTA processing, affect the pace of material exchange. Our analysis may assist in streamlining transfer processes to a greater extent than standardisation.

Funding

Australian Research Council

History

Publication title

Journal of Law and Information Science

Volume

25

Pagination

89-115

ISSN

0729-1485

Department/School

Faculty of Law

Publisher

UTAS

Place of publication

Australia

Rights statement

© 2021 Journal of Law, Information & Science and Faculty of Law, University of Tasmania.

Repository Status

  • Open

Socio-economic Objectives

Law reform; Legislation, civil and criminal codes; Expanding knowledge in law and legal studies

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC