File(s) under permanent embargo
How downplaying or exaggerating crime severity in a confession affects perceived guilt
This study investigates how judgments of guilt are influenced by factual errors in confessions that either amplify or downplay the severity of the crime. Participants read a confession statement and police report in which either the confession was consistent with the police report, the suspect admitted to a worse crime or the suspect admitted to a lesser crime. Mediation analyses showed that, compared to consistent confessions, both types of directional errors reduced judgments of guilt. Inconsistencies that made the suspect look better – but not those that made the suspect look worse –also increased judgments of guilt via a direct effect. Confessions that contain errors that appear to exaggerate the severity of the crime prompt no higher judgments of suspect guilt; however, errors in confessions that are perceived to downplay the severity of the crime can prompt an increased perception of suspect guilt compared to a consistent confession.
History
Publication title
Psychiatry Psychology and LawISSN
1321-8719Department/School
School of Psychological SciencesPublisher
RoutledgePlace of publication
United KingdomRights statement
© 2020 The Australian and New Zealand Association of Psychiatry, Psychology and LawRepository Status
- Restricted