This study examines how Australian learners of Chinese make requests as compared to those made by native speakers of Mandarin Chinese. Data were collected through a written production questionnaire comprising six situations. Results showed that learners and native speakers shared a preference for conventional indirectness. However, they favoured different strategy types in the realizations of requests. Moreover, native speakers tended to adjust their selection of request strategies according to social variables such as relative power, social distance, and rank of imposition, whereas learners displayed little sensitivity to social variables in the selection of request strategies. This study also provides some evidence of pragmatic development. Learners’ use of directness decreased but their use of conventional indirectness increased with increased proficiency. Moreover, learners’ acquisition of pragmalinguistic competence seemed to outperform their sociopragmatic competence. This study adds to the small body of research on requests by learners of Chinese as a foreign language. It highlights the importance of the inclusion of pragmatics in foreign language teaching.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Keywords:	interlanguage pragmatics, pragmatic competence, requests, Chinese
Research Division:	Language, Communication and Culture
Research Group:	Linguistics
Research Field:	Discourse and pragmatics
Objective Division:	Culture and Society
Objective Group:	Communication
Objective Field:	Languages and linguistics
UTAS Author:	Li, W (Dr Lucy Li)
ID Code:	143181
Year Published:	2019
Deposited By:	Global Cultures and Languages
Deposited On:	2021-03-03
Last Modified:	2021-08-27
Downloads:	0