eCite Digital Repository

A comparison of laboratory analysis methods for total phenolic content of cider

Citation

Way, ML and Jones, JE and Nichols, DS and Dambergs, RG and Swarts, ND, A comparison of laboratory analysis methods for total phenolic content of cider, Beverages, 6, (3) Article 55. ISSN 2306-5710 (2020) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
439Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2020 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

DOI: doi:10.3390/beverages6030055

Abstract

Total phenolic content is widely accepted as a key measure of quality for cider. Apple juice and cider, made from six apple varieties including dessert and cider apples, were analysed for total phenolics using three different methods: (a) the Folin-Ciocalteu method, (b) the Somers method (a spectrophotometric method developed specifically for wine), and (c) ultra-performance liquid chromatography (UPLC) as a benchmark test. Of these approaches, the Somers method had the strongest correlation with UPLC with an R2 value of 0.99, whilst the Folin-Ciocalteu correlated with UPLC with an R2 value of 0.89. The Folin-Ciocalteu method also had a strong positive correlation with the Somers approach with an R2 value of 0.91. Correlations between methods were strongest for apple varieties that were naturally high in phenolic content. These results highlight the potential of the Somers method to rapidly, inexpensively, and accurately report the total phenolic content of apple juice and ciders made from dessert and cider apple varieties.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:apple, Folin-Ciocalteu, Somers, spectrophotometric, UPLC, apple variety, cider, beverages
Research Division:Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences
Research Group:Horticultural production
Research Field:Post harvest horticultural technologies (incl. transportation and storage)
Objective Division:Plant Production and Plant Primary Products
Objective Group:Horticultural crops
Objective Field:Pome fruit, pip fruit
UTAS Author:Way, ML (Miss Madeleine Way)
UTAS Author:Jones, JE (Dr Joanna Jones)
UTAS Author:Nichols, DS (Dr David Nichols)
UTAS Author:Dambergs, RG (Dr Robert Dambergs)
UTAS Author:Swarts, ND (Dr Nigel Swarts)
ID Code:142765
Year Published:2020
Web of Science® Times Cited:2
Deposited By:TIA - Research Institute
Deposited On:2021-02-11
Last Modified:2021-04-09
Downloads:2 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page