In September 2020, a detailed report on Heritable Human Genome Editing was published. The report offers a translational pathway for the limited approval of germline editing under limited circumstances and assuming various criteria have been met. In this perspective, some three dozen experts from the fields of genome editing, medicine, bioethics, law, and related fields offer their candid reactions to the National Academies/Royal Society report, highlighting areas of support, omissions, disagreements, and priorities moving forward.

Item Type:	Letter or Note in Journal
Keywords:	Genome editing, ethics, law
Research Division:	Law and Legal Studies
Research Group:	Law in context
Research Field:	Medical and health law
Objective Division:	Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:	Justice and the law
Objective Field:	Law reform
UTAS Author:	Nicol, D (Professor Dianne Nicol)
ID Code:	142082
Year Published:	2020
Web of Science® Times Cited:	8
Deposited By:	Law
Deposited On:	2020-12-10
Last Modified:	2020-12-22
Downloads:	0