eCite Digital Repository

Exploring the key drivers of forest flammability in wet eucalypt forests using expert-derived conceptual models

Citation

Cawson, JG and Hemming, V and Ackland, A and Anderson, W and Bowman, D and Bradstock, R and Brown, TP and Burton, J and Cary, GJ and Duff, TJ and Filkov, A and Furlaud, JM and Gazzard, T and Kilinc, M and Nyman, P and Peacock, R and Ryan, M and Sharples, J and Sheridan, G and Tolhurst, K and Wells, T and Zylstra, P and Penman, TD, Exploring the key drivers of forest flammability in wet eucalypt forests using expert-derived conceptual models, Landscape Ecology, 35, (8) pp. 1775-1798. ISSN 0921-2973 (2020) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2020 Springer Nature B.V.

DOI: doi:10.1007/s10980-020-01055-z

Abstract

Context: Fire behaviour research has largely focused on dry ecosystems that burn frequently, with far less attention on wetter forests. Yet, the impacts of fire in wet forests can be high and therefore understanding the drivers of fire in these systems is vital.

Objectives: We sought to identify and rank by importance the factors plausibly driving flammability in wet eucalypt forests, and describe relationships between them. In doing so, we formulated a set of research priorities.

Methods: Conceptual models of forest flammability in wet eucalypt forests were elicited from 21 fire experts using a combination of elicitation techniques. Forest flammability was defined using fire occurrence and fireline intensity as measures of ignitability and heat release rate, respectively.

Results: There were shared and divergent opinions about the drivers of flammability in wet eucalypt forests. Widely agreed factors were drought, dead fine fuel moisture content, weather and topography. These factors all influence the availability of biomass to burn, albeit their effects and interactions on various dimensions of flammability are poorly understood. Differences between the models related to lesser understood factors (e.g. live and coarse fuel moisture, plant traits, heatwaves) and the links between factors.

Conclusions: By documenting alternative conceptual models, we made shared and divergent opinions explicit about flammability in wet forests. We identified four priority research areas: (1) quantifying drought and fuel moisture thresholds for fire occurrence and intensity, (2) modelling microclimate in dense vegetation and rugged terrain, (3) determining the attributes of live vegetation that influence forest flammability, (4) evaluating fire management strategies.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:forests, fire
Research Division:Environmental Sciences
Research Group:Ecological applications
Research Field:Landscape ecology
Objective Division:Environmental Management
Objective Group:Terrestrial systems and management
Objective Field:Terrestrial biodiversity
UTAS Author:Bowman, D (Professor David Bowman)
UTAS Author:Furlaud, JM (Mr James Furlaud)
ID Code:141121
Year Published:2020
Deposited By:Plant Science
Deposited On:2020-09-26
Last Modified:2020-10-16
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page