eCite Digital Repository

Validation of the Australian Treatment Outcomes Profile for use in clients with cannabis dependence

Citation

Mills, L and Lintzeris, N and Bruno, R and Montebello, M and Dunlop, A and Deacon, RM and Copeland, J and Jefferies, M and Rivas, C and Mammen, K, Validation of the Australian Treatment Outcomes Profile for use in clients with cannabis dependence, Drug and Alcohol Review, 39, (4) pp. 356-364. ISSN 0959-5236 (2020) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2020 Australasian Professional Society on Alcohol and other Drugs

DOI: doi:10.1111/dar.13050

Abstract

Introduction and Aims:The Australian Treatment Outcomes Profile (ATOP) was developed as a clinical tool for monitoring the substance use, health and wellbeing of clients in alcohol and other drug treatment. This is the first psychometric validation of the ATOP in a cannabis-dependent treatment population.

Design and Methods: A total of 128 individuals with cannabis dependence enrolled in an outpatient randomised controlled trial were administered the ATOP and gold-standard health and wellbeing questionnaires once by clinicians and once by researchers at baseline. Concurrent validity was assessed by testing ATOP Psychological Health, Physical Health and Quality of Life questions against concurrently administered goldstandard questionnaires: the Short Form 36 Health Survey (SF-36), the 21-item Depression, Anxiety and Stress Scale (DASS-21) and the Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS). Interrater reliability was tested by comparing clinician-administered ATOP items at the medical screening interview to the same ATOP items administered by researchers at baseline.

Results: ATOP Psychological Health showed moderate to strong correlations with SF-36 Mental Components, SF-36 Mental Health and DASS-21 scores (r = 0.40–0.52) and ATOP Physical Health with SF-36 Physical Components and SF-36 General Health scores (r = 0.36–0.67). The ATOP Quality of Life scale showed moderate agreement with the SDS and sixdimensional health state short form scales (r = 0.38–0.40). ATOP substance use, employment, education and child care items showed good to excellent interrater reliability (Krippendorff’s α = 0.62–0.81), and tobacco use, Psychological Health, Physical Health and Quality of Life showed fair to moderate interrater reliability (Krippendorff’s α = 0.42–0.53). Discussion and Conclusions. The ATOP appears to be valid and reliable when tested in a population with cannabis-dependence, justifying its widespread use in clinical settings.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:clinical outcome monitoring, health service evaluation, psychometric validation, cannabis dependence, addiction treatment
Research Division:Psychology
Research Group:Biological psychology
Research Field:Behavioural neuroscience
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Public health (excl. specific population health)
Objective Field:Public health (excl. specific population health) not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Bruno, R (Associate Professor Raimondo Bruno)
ID Code:139798
Year Published:2020
Web of Science® Times Cited:5
Deposited By:Psychology
Deposited On:2020-07-06
Last Modified:2020-08-05
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page