eCite Digital Repository

A framework for analyzing and evaluating architectures and control strategies in distributed remote laboratories


Maiti, A and Zutin, DG and Wuttke, H-D and Henke, K and Maxwell, AD and Kist, AA, A framework for analyzing and evaluating architectures and control strategies in distributed remote laboratories, IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies, 11, (4) pp. 441-455. ISSN 1939-1382 (2018) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2017 IEEE. Personal use of this material is permitted. Permission from IEEE must be obtained for all other uses, in any current or future media, including reprinting/republishing this material for advertising or promotional purposes, creating new collective works, for resale or redistribution to servers or lists, or reuse of any copyrighted component of this work in other works.

DOI: doi:10.1109/TLT.2017.2787758


Remote Access Laboratories (RALs) have been used to develop experimental knowledge about practical engineering topics for a while. Distributed remote laboratories aim to share experiment among institutions and individuals through a distributed architecture. Experiments from diverse areas are combined as part of a larger system. Multiple control strategies are used to integrate experiments in Remote Laboratory Management Systems (RLMSs). This work defines two main categories to analyze the various implementations, white box and black box approaches. Experiments can be on a spectrum between these two extremes, sharing properties of both. When integrating an existing experiment into a new distributed RAL system, it is useful to evaluate the experiment with respect to its host or new RLMS for determining the best strategies to assimilate it. This paper provides a framework for such evaluation based on a number of properties of experiments. The proposed framework is called SHASS (Software, Hardware, Assessment, Support, and Share-ability) based on several factors such as the hardware used, the software to create the program, methods of sharing, user's support, and assessment of user's performance. It can be used to evaluate quality and identify options for improvements within an experiment's existing RLMS as well. Using this framework, a black box and white box approach are compared using two examples - federated and Peer-to-Peer RAL. The evaluation focuses on technical capabilities and development possibilities. A set of four experiments are also analysed to illustrate the utility of the framework in creating and improving experiments with respect to their RLMS

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:remote laboratories, e-learning, networked control systems, educational technology, peer-to-peer computing, sensors, monitoring, Internet of Things
Research Division:Information and Computing Sciences
Research Group:Distributed computing and systems software
Research Field:Distributed computing and systems software not elsewhere classified
Objective Division:Education and Training
Objective Group:Teaching and curriculum
Objective Field:Teaching and instruction technologies
UTAS Author:Maiti, A (Dr Ananda Maiti)
ID Code:139785
Year Published:2018 (online first 2017)
Web of Science® Times Cited:10
Deposited By:Information and Communication Technology
Deposited On:2020-07-03
Last Modified:2020-08-21

Repository Staff Only: item control page