University of Tasmania
Browse
139306 - App-based supplemental exercise - Final author version.pdf (264.08 kB)

App-based supplemental exercise in rehabilitation, adherence, and effect on outcomes: a randomized controlled trial

Download (264.08 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 14:53 authored by Li, I, Bui, T, Hoang PhanHoang Phan, Llado, A, King, C, Scrivener, K
Question: To determine the uptake of an app-based supplemental exercise programme in a rehabilitation setting and the effect of such a programme on length of stay and function compared to usual care physiotherapy.

Design: Randomized controlled trial with random allocation and assessor blinding.

Participants: A total of 144 individuals with mixed diagnoses (orthopaedic, neurological, reconditioning) admitted for inpatient sub-acute rehabilitation.

Interventions: Participants were randomly allocated to usual care physiotherapy (control group) or usual care physiotherapy with the addition of an app-based supplemental exercise programme (intervention group).

Outcome measures: The primary measure of interest was total supplementary exercise dosage completed by the intervention group. The primary between-group outcome measure was length of stay with secondary measures including walking endurance (Six-Minute Walk Test), walking speed (10-Metre Walk Test), functional mobility (Timed Up and Go Test) and level of disability (Functional Independence Measure).

Results: Participants in the intervention group performed 7 minutes (SD: 9) or 49 repetitions (SD: 48) of supplementary exercise using the app each day. There were no differences between the groups for length of stay (mean difference (MD): -0.5 days, 95% confidence interval (CI): -3.2 to 2.2) or change in any secondary functional outcome measures, including walking speed (MD: -0.1 m/s, 95% CI: -0.2 to 0.0) and disability (MD: -0.9, 95% CI: -3.6 to 1.8).

Conclusion: A small supplementary exercise dose was achieved by participants in the intervention group. However, such a programme did not affect length of stay or functional outcomes when compared to usual care.

History

Publication title

Clinical Rehabilitation

Volume

34

Issue

8

Pagination

1083-1093

ISSN

0269-2155

Department/School

Menzies Institute for Medical Research

Publisher

Arnold

Place of publication

Hodder Headline Plc, 338 Euston Road, London, England, Nw1 3Bh

Rights statement

Copyright 2020 The Authors

Repository Status

  • Open

Socio-economic Objectives

Evaluation of health outcomes; Public health (excl. specific population health) not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC