University of Tasmania
Browse
138822 - Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab - Final author version.pdf (479.68 kB)

Efficacy and safety of tocilizumab in treatment of Takayasu arteritis: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials

Download (479.68 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 14:02 authored by Ambrish SinghAmbrish Singh, Danda, D, Hussain, S, Najmi, AK, Mathew, A, Goel, R, Lakhan, SE, Tajudheen, B, Benny Eathakkattu AntonyBenny Eathakkattu Antony
Background: Takayasu arteritis (TAK) is a chronic immune vasculitis in which Interleukin-6 (IL-6) receptors play a key role in pathogenesis. Tocilizumab (TCZ), an IL-6 receptor antagonist with a favorable safety and efficacy profile, has been tried as an option for patients with TAK. This systematic review analyzed the evidence from randomized control trials (RCT) assessing the safety and efficacy of TCZ in patients with TAK.

Methods: MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and clinical trial registries were searched from inception to July 2018. We included RCT assessing the efficacy and safety of TCZ versus placebo/other comparators for the treatment of patients with TAK. The risk of bias (RoB) was assessed using Cochrane RoB tool.

Results: 2799 identified articles were screened as per abstract and title; 42 selected full-texts articles were assessed for the potential inclusion. One trial, reported in two publications, comparing subcutaneous TCZ (162 mg/week) versus matching placebo in 36 patients with TAK was included. The relapse-free rate at 24 weeks was 50.6% and 22.9% in TCZ and placebo arm, respectively. The hazard ratio (HR) for time to first relapse was statistically significant in the per-protocol population (HR 0.34 [95.41% CI, 0.11-1.00]; p = .0345), while non-significant in the intention-to-treat population (HR 0.41 [95.41% CI, 0.15-1.10]; p = .0596). The serious adverse events were higher in the placebo arm.

Conclusions: This systematic review finds the existing evidence from RCT on efficacy and safety profile of TCZ in TAK to be promising but limited. Additional evidence is required to draw a stronger conclusion.

History

Publication title

Modern Rheumatology

Volume

31

Pagination

197-204

ISSN

1439-7595

Department/School

Menzies Institute for Medical Research

Publisher

Taylor & Francis

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Rights statement

Copyright 2020 Japan College of Rheumatology. This is a post-peer-review, pre-copyedit version of an article published in Modern Rheumatology. The final authenticated version is available online at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14397595.2020.1724671

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Clinical health not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC