eCite Digital Repository

What neuroscientific studies tell us about inhibition of return

Citation

Satel, J and Wilson, NR and Klein, RM, What neuroscientific studies tell us about inhibition of return, Vision, 3, (4) pp. 1-13. ISSN 2411-5150 (2019) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
412Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2020 The Authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

DOI: doi:10.3390/vision3040058

Abstract

An inhibitory aftermath of orienting, inhibition of return (IOR), has intrigued scholars since its discovery about 40 years ago. Since then, the phenomenon has been subjected to a wide range of neuroscientific methods and the results of these are reviewed in this paper. These include direct manipulations of brain structures (which occur naturally in brain damage and disease or experimentally as in TMS and lesion studies) and measurements of brain activity (in humans using EEG and fMRI and in animals using single unit recording). A variety of less direct methods (e.g., computational modeling, developmental studies, etc.) have also been used. The findings from this wide range of methods support the critical role of subcortical and cortical oculomotor pathways in the generation and nature of IOR.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:attention
Research Division:Psychology
Research Group:Biological psychology
Research Field:Behavioural neuroscience
Objective Division:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:Expanding knowledge
Objective Field:Expanding knowledge in psychology
UTAS Author:Satel, J (Dr Jason Satel)
UTAS Author:Wilson, NR (Mr Nicholas Wilson)
ID Code:138202
Year Published:2019
Deposited By:Psychology
Deposited On:2020-03-27
Last Modified:2020-05-26
Downloads:2 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page