eCite Digital Repository

Re-discovering the social: neo-liberalism and hybrid practices of governing in rural natural resource management

Citation

Higgins, V and Lockie, S, Re-discovering the social: neo-liberalism and hybrid practices of governing in rural natural resource management, Journal of Rural Studies, 18, (4) pp. 419-428. ISSN 0743-0167 (2002) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright © 2002 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.

Official URL: https://www-sciencedirect-com.ezproxy.utas.edu.au/...

DOI: doi:10.1016/S0743-0167(02)00034-7

Abstract

Since the 1980s, natural resource management (NRM) in rural Australia has been underpinned by rationalities and technologies of governing that constitute agricultural landscapes and resource managers in economically rational terms. While it is tempting to interpret these forms of regulation as part of a broad shift away from social forms of governing, this paper argues that ‘the social’ remains of crucial significance in understanding how both natural environments and the capacities of individuals to manage these environments are constructed. Drawing upon recent work in the Foucauldian-inspired literature on governmentality and, in particular, Stenson and Watt's (Urban Studies 36(1) (1999) 189–201) concept of hybrid governance, this paper examines how particular representations of ‘the social’ are assembled through strategies of NRM. Using the National Landcare Program (NLP) and Natural Heritage Trust (NHT) as examples, we consider how ‘social’ data is being incorporated into resource management strategies, and how this re-shapes both ‘the social’ and NRM as domains of governance. While the NLP and NHT incorporate concerns about social responsibility, they define these in terms of the capacity of individuals to respond to changing economic circumstances. This effectively defines land managers as socially and ecologically responsible only to the extent that they have the managerial capacities to pursue economically ‘rational’ practices. In concluding, we argue that hybrid practices of governing are indeed evident in NRM in Australia and that the concept of ‘hybrid governance’ requires further attention in understanding how rural spaces are made knowable and shaped as objects of knowledge.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:neoliberalism, natural resource management, Australia
Research Division:Studies in Human Society
Research Group:Sociology
Research Field:Rural Sociology
Objective Division:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Field:Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society
UTAS Author:Higgins, V (Associate Professor Vaughan Higgins)
ID Code:138189
Year Published:2002
Web of Science® Times Cited:85
Deposited By:Office of the School of Social Sciences
Deposited On:2020-03-26
Last Modified:2020-07-30
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page