eCite Digital Repository

Private Agri-food Standards: Contestation, Hybridity and the Politics of Standards

Citation

Bain, C and Ransom, E and Higgins, V, Private Agri-food Standards: Contestation, Hybridity and the Politics of Standards, International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food, 20, (1) pp. 1-10. ISSN 0798-1759 (2013) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
199Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2013 The Authors

Official URL: http://ijsaf.org/index.php/ijsaf/index

Abstract

Standards are an omnipresent yet generally taken-for-granted part of our everyday life (Higgins and Larner, 2010a; Timmermans and Epstein, 2010; Busch, 2011). Until recently, standards within the agri-food sector were typically dismissed (if thought of at all) by social scientists as rather benign, technical tools, primarily of interest to specialists concerned with facilitating markets and trade. Over the past decade, however, this assessment has changed considerably and many agri-food scholars now view standards as a useful entry point for analysing and understanding our social and material world. The degree of interest today is reflected in the fact that our call for papers on private agri-food standards attracted so many high-quality submissions that we are publishing this special issues in two parts.1 In part, this shift in interest reflects the influence of science studies and its concern with studying ‘mundane’ and taken-for-granted objects and practices (Higgins and Larner, 2010b). Here scholars take inanimate objects seriously, to understand, for example, how non-human actors such as standards allow humans to ‘act at a distance’ (Latour, 1987), thereby ordering relations across time and space. Many agri-food researchers are also concerned with the rise of private food standards developed by global retailers and non-government organizations, including understanding the role that these standards might play in coordinating and governing production and consumption relations within the context of globalization (Giovannucci and Ponte, 2005; Hatanaka et al., 2005; Mutersbaugh, 2005; Tallontire et al., 2011).

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:standards, agriculture, supply chains, politics
Research Division:Studies in Human Society
Research Group:Sociology
Research Field:Rural Sociology
Objective Division:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Field:Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society
UTAS Author:Higgins, V (Associate Professor Vaughan Higgins)
ID Code:138163
Year Published:2013
Deposited By:Office of the School of Social Sciences
Deposited On:2020-03-26
Last Modified:2020-08-17
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page