eCite Digital Repository

Getting Big and Getting Out: Government Policy, Self-Reliance and Farm Adjustment

Citation

Higgins, V and Lockie, S, Getting Big and Getting Out: Government Policy, Self-Reliance and Farm Adjustment, Rurality Bites: The Social and Environmental Transformation of Rural Australia, Pluto Press, S Lockie and L Bourke (ed), Annandale, pp. 178-190. ISBN 9781864031690 (2001) [Research Book Chapter]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2001 Lisa Bourke and Stewart Lockie

Official URL: https://www.plutobooks.com/

Abstract

‘Adjustment’ is a relatively benign sounding word used by economists to describe the entry and exit of firms from industries undergoing some sort of structural change. In the case of farming, this process has seen a significant decrease in the total number of farms in Australia — from 189,400 in 1970 to 124,975 in 1990. Economic changes at both theglobal and national level have raised serious questions about the ability of some farmers to compete in international markets and to earn adequate incomes. Terms of trade (the ratio of prices received relative to the cost of production) have been in decline since the 1950s, placing constant pressure on farmers to increase productivity in relation to labour and capital by expanding landholdings and increasing the intensity of production. In order to finance these productivity gains farm indebtedness has increased dramatically; rising from $9.5 billion in 1977-78 to $15.4 billion in 1992-93, and thence to $21.6 billion in 1997-98 in real terms. Yet average rates of return on investment in agriculture are extremely low and are unlikely to increase without substantial structural change. In fact, lifting the average return on investment in agriculture from its current 1.05 percent to a ‘modest’ 5 percent would require unreaslistic price rises for agricultural commodities of some 23.2 percent. The important point to note, however, is that not all farms earn such low rates of return. Australian agriculture has seen increasing polarisation between small and large farms, with the top 20 percent of broadacre enterprises producing over half the output and earning favourable returns on investment. This is reflected in a phenomenon called the ‘disappearing middle’. Between 1994-95 and 1997-98 the number of farms turning over less than $300,000 dropped by 12 percent, while the number of farms turning over $300,000 or more increased by 30 percent. As Table 1 shows, the most dramatic decreases were evident among middle-sized farms rather than among the very small who have more capacity to augment farm earnings with off-farm income.

Item Details

Item Type:Research Book Chapter
Keywords:farm adjustment, government policy, Australia
Research Division:Studies in Human Society
Research Group:Sociology
Research Field:Rural Sociology
Objective Division:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Group:Expanding Knowledge
Objective Field:Expanding Knowledge through Studies of Human Society
UTAS Author:Higgins, V (Associate Professor Vaughan Higgins)
ID Code:138156
Year Published:2001
Deposited By:Office of the School of Social Sciences
Deposited On:2020-03-26
Last Modified:2020-05-20
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page