eCite Digital Repository
The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science
Rapport, F and Clay-Williams, R and Churruca, K and Shih, P and Hogden, A and Braithwaite, J, The struggle of translating science into action: Foundational concepts of implementation science, Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice, 24, (1) pp. 117-126. ISSN 1356-1294 (2017) [Refereed Article]
Copyright 2017 The Authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Rationale, aims, and objectives: "Implementation science," the scientific study of methods translating research findings into practical, useful outcomes, is contested and complex, with unpredictable use of results from routine clinical practice and different levels of continuing assessment of implementable interventions. The authors aim to reveal how implementation science is presented and understood in health services research contexts and clarify the foundational concepts: diffusion, dissemination, implementation, adoption, and sustainability, to progress knowledge in the field.
Method: Implementation science models, theories, and frameworks are critiqued, and their value for laying the groundwork from which to implement a study’s findings is emphasised. The paper highlights the challenges of turning research findings into practical outcomes that can be successfully implemented and the need for support from change agents, to ensure improvements to health care provision, health systems, and policy. The paper examines how researchers create implementation plans and what needs to be considered for study outputs to lead to sustainable interventions. This aspect needs clear planning, underpinned by appropriate theoretical paradigms that rigorously respond to a study’s aims and objectives.
Conclusion: Researchers might benefit from a return to first principles in implementation science, whereby applications that result from research endeavours are both effective and readily disseminated and where interventions can be supported by appropriate health care personnel. These should be people specifically identified to promote change in service organisation, delivery, and policy that can be systematically evaluated over time, to ensure high‐quality, long‐term improvements to patients’ health.
|Item Type:||Refereed Article|
|Keywords:||evidence‐based health care and policy, health services research, implementable research findings, implementation science|
|Research Division:||Health Sciences|
|Research Group:||Health services and systems|
|Research Field:||Health services and systems not elsewhere classified|
|Objective Group:||Evaluation of health and support services|
|Objective Field:||Evaluation of health and support services not elsewhere classified|
|UTAS Author:||Hogden, A (Dr Anne Hogden)|
|Web of Science® Times Cited:||123|
|Deposited By:||Australian Institute of Health Service Management|
|Downloads:||15 View Download Statistics|
Repository Staff Only: item control page