eCite Digital Repository
Multivariate statistical analysis of trace elements in pyrite: prediction, bias and artefacts in defining mineral signatures
Citation
Dmitrijeva, M and Cook, NJ and Ehrig, K and Ciobanu, CL and Metcalfe, AV and Kamenetsky, M and Kamenetsky, VS and Gilbert, S, Multivariate statistical analysis of trace elements in pyrite: prediction, bias and artefacts in defining mineral signatures, Minerals, 10, (1) Article 61. ISSN 2075-163X (2020) [Refereed Article]
![]() | PDF (Published version) 4Mb |
Copyright Statement
© 2020 by the authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
Official URL: https://www.mdpi.com/2075-163X/10/1/61
Abstract
Pyrite is the most common sulphide in a wide range of ore deposits and well known to host
numerous trace elements, with implications for recovery of valuable metals and for generation of
clean concentrates. Trace element signatures of pyrite are also widely used to understand ore-forming
processes. Pyrite is an important component of the Olympic Dam Cu–U–Au–Ag orebody, South
Australia. Using a multivariate statistical approach applied to a large trace element dataset derived
from analysis of random pyrite grains, trace element signatures in Olympic Dam pyrite are assessed.
Pyrite is characterised by: (i) a Ag–Bi–Pb signature predicting inclusions of tellurides (as PC1); and (ii)
highly variable Co–Ni ratios likely representing an oscillatory zonation pattern in pyrite (as PC2).
Pyrite is a major host for As, Co and probably also Ni. These three elements do not correlate well
at the grain-scale, indicating high variability in zonation patterns. Arsenic is not, however, a good
predictor for invisible Au at Olympic Dam. Most pyrites contain only negligible Au, suggesting
that invisible gold in pyrite is not commonplace within the deposit. A minority of pyrite grains
analysed do, however, contain Au which correlates with Ag, Bi and Te. The results are interpreted to
reflect not only primary patterns but also the eects of multi-stage overprinting, including cycles
of partial replacement and recrystallisation. The latter may have caused element release from the
pyrite lattice and entrapment as mineral inclusions, as widely observed for other ore and gangue
minerals within the deposit. Results also show the critical impact on predictive interpretations made
from statistical analysis of large datasets containing a large percentage of left-censored values (i.e.,
those falling below the minimum limits of detection). The treatment of such values in large datasets
is critical as the number of these values impacts on the cluster results. Trimming of datasets to
eliminate artefacts introduced by left-censored data should be performed with caution lest bias be
unintentionally introduced. The practice may, however, reveal meaningful correlations that might be
diluted using the complete dataset.
Item Details
Item Type: | Refereed Article |
---|---|
Keywords: | pyrite, trace elements, multivariate statistics, left-censored data, Olympic Dam |
Research Division: | Earth Sciences |
Research Group: | Geology |
Research Field: | Mineralogy and crystallography |
Objective Division: | Mineral Resources (Excl. Energy Resources) |
Objective Group: | Mineral exploration |
Objective Field: | Copper ore exploration |
UTAS Author: | Kamenetsky, M (Dr Maya Kamenetsky) |
UTAS Author: | Kamenetsky, VS (Professor Vadim Kamenetsky) |
ID Code: | 137086 |
Year Published: | 2020 |
Funding Support: | Australian Research Council (LP130100438) |
Web of Science® Times Cited: | 3 |
Deposited By: | CODES ARC |
Deposited On: | 2020-01-30 |
Last Modified: | 2020-04-02 |
Downloads: | 4 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page