University of Tasmania
Browse
136738 - How do interprofessional healthcare teams perceive the benefits.pdf (512.17 kB)

How do interprofessional healthcare teams perceive the benefits and challenges of interdisciplinary ward rounds

Download (512.17 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 09:41 authored by Victoria Walton, Anne HogdenAnne Hogden, Long, JC, Johnson, JK, Greenfield, D

Purpose: Interdisciplinary bedside ward rounds have the capacity to facilitate coordinated interprofessional patient care. To be an effective means of care coordination, clinicians need an explicit understanding of how these rounds contribute to patient care. By identifying benefits and challenges to the effective use of interdisciplinary ward rounds, clinicians create an opportunity to improve interprofessional teamwork, care planning, and coordination of patient care.

Methods: A survey was conducted with frontline professionals in two acute care and two rehabilitation wards from a metropolitan teaching hospital. There were 77 participants, representing medical officers, nurses, and allied health clinicians. Questions examined the perceived benefits and challenges of conducting interdisciplinary ward rounds in their units. Survey findings were coded for meaning and then grouped into themes.

Results: Benefits revealed a desired care delivery model challenged by the complexities of organizational and professional cultures. The themes of “being on the same page”, “focusing on patients”, and “holistic care planning” underpinned the ideas of collaboration and improved patient-centred care, that is, benefits to patients. Challenges centred on health professionals' time constraints and the coordination of teams to enable participation in rounds. The themes were more distinct, logistical barriers of “time”, “workforce”, and “care planning”.

Conclusion: Overall, clinicians recognise there are greater benefits to IBRs and have a willingness to participate. However, careful consideration is required to introduce and continually achieve the best from IBR as they require changes in organizational context and culture.

History

Publication title

Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare

Volume

12

Pagination

1023-1032

ISSN

1178-2390

Department/School

Australian Institute of Health Service Management (AIHSM)

Publisher

Dove Medical Press Ltd.(Dovepress)

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Rights statement

Copyright 2019 Walton et al. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported (CC BY-NC 3.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/

Repository Status

  • Open

Socio-economic Objectives

Public health (excl. specific population health) not elsewhere classified

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC