eCite Digital Repository

Exercising the Faculty of Judgement: What is at Stake?

Citation

Tatman, L, Exercising the Faculty of Judgement: What is at Stake?, On Human Judgement, Hobart, Tasmania, pp. 49-54. ISBN 978-0-646-59804-8 (2018) [Refereed Conference Paper]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2018 Lucy Tatman

Abstract

Today, I am going to wrestle with the question of what is at stake when it comes to exercising the human faculty of judgement. In order to think through this matter, I will be looking to the work of Hannah Arendt, who was arguably the most original and provocative twentieth century political theorist and thinker of the human condition. As many of you will know, Arendt planned to write a book titled Judging, which was to be the third and final volume of her last major work, The Life of the Mind. Sadly, she died with the first page of Judging still in her typewriter. Although we will never be sure how Arendt would finally have characterised the process and act of judging, I think it is possible to identify why she was so concerned that human beings use the faculty of judgement. To understand why judgement mattered so much to Arendt requires, however, that we take a circuitous route through her thought. More specifically, I must begin by tracing an unusual set of distinctions she drew between, first, homo sapiens, second, human beings (who have achieved humanness), and finally, humanity.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Conference Paper
Keywords:Hannah Arendt, judgement, world
Research Division:Philosophy and Religious Studies
Research Group:Philosophy
Research Field:Phenomenology
Objective Division:Culture and Society
Objective Group:Other culture and society
Objective Field:Other culture and society not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Tatman, L (Dr Lucy Tatman)
ID Code:136476
Year Published:2018
Deposited By:Office of the School of Humanities
Deposited On:2019-12-23
Last Modified:2019-12-23
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page