University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Contemporary Politics and the Rush to Form Rudimentary Judgements

conference contribution
posted on 2023-05-23, 14:23 authored by Keith JacobsKeith Jacobs
Judgements require us to separate ourselves from our object of study. It was the nineteenth century philosopher Brentano, who argued that all acts of consciousness are directed towards an object.2 In the broad context of politics, all of us make judgements and our engagement with others requires us to do so. In this discussion, I begin by differentiating two forms. First, those judgements that are made in haste, often without sufficient acknowledgement of responsibilities and second, more deliberative judgements. It is this second form of judgement that requires us to consider our own responsibilities. Most importantly, these are usually provisional and, so, subject to revision. In this discussion, I consider if there is a connection between the rush to judge and the current malaise in politics. I also ask whether the rush to judge is our way to expunge problematic feelings and absolve our responsibilities.

History

Publication title

On Human Judgement

Editors

R Lindstrom and A Woitowicz

Pagination

63-69

ISBN

978-0-646-59804-8

Department/School

School of Social Sciences

Publisher

University of Tasmania

Place of publication

Hobart, Tasmania

Event title

W. D. Joske Interdisciplinary Colloquia - 2017

Event Venue

Hobart, Tasmania

Date of Event (Start Date)

2018-01-01

Date of Event (End Date)

2018-01-01

Rights statement

Copyright 2018 Keith Jacobs

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in philosophy and religious studies

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC