File(s) under permanent embargo
Contemporary Politics and the Rush to Form Rudimentary Judgements
Judgements require us to separate ourselves from our object of study. It was the nineteenth century philosopher Brentano, who argued that all acts of consciousness are directed towards an object.2 In the broad context of politics, all of us make judgements and our engagement with others requires us to do so. In this discussion, I begin by differentiating two forms. First, those judgements that are made in haste, often without sufficient acknowledgement of responsibilities and second, more deliberative judgements. It is this second form of judgement that requires us to consider our own responsibilities. Most importantly, these are usually provisional and, so, subject to revision. In this discussion, I consider if there is a connection between the rush to judge and the current malaise in politics. I also ask whether the rush to judge is our way to expunge problematic feelings and absolve our responsibilities.
History
Publication title
On Human JudgementEditors
R Lindstrom and A WoitowiczPagination
63-69ISBN
978-0-646-59804-8Department/School
School of Social SciencesPublisher
University of TasmaniaPlace of publication
Hobart, TasmaniaEvent title
W. D. Joske Interdisciplinary Colloquia - 2017Event Venue
Hobart, TasmaniaDate of Event (Start Date)
2018-01-01Date of Event (End Date)
2018-01-01Rights statement
Copyright 2018 Keith JacobsRepository Status
- Restricted