eCite Digital Repository

Bioregionalization approaches for conservation: methods, biases, and their implications for Australian biodiversity

Citation

Montalvo-Mancheno, CS and Ondei, S and Brook, BW and Buettel, JC, Bioregionalization approaches for conservation: methods, biases, and their implications for Australian biodiversity, Biodiversity and Conservation, 29, (1) pp. 1-17. ISSN 0960-3115 (2019) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF (author version - OA)
820Kb
  

Copyright Statement

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

DOI: doi:10.1007/s10531-019-01913-6

Abstract

Biogeographic classification schemes have been developed to prioritize biodiversity conservation efforts at large scales, but their efficacy remains understudied. Here we develop a systematic map of the literature on bioregional planning, based on a case study of the Interim Biogeographic Regionalization for Australia (IBRA), to identify where and how such schemes have been used in scientific research. We identified 67 relevant studies, finding that the majority investigated biodiversity exclusively within a single bioregion (65.7%), with 18 of these studies splitting the targeted bioregion based on administrative boundaries. Most used inferential techniques (74.6%) or pattern-based measures (68.7%), and few studies (9%) both considered biodiversity across multiple bioregions and compared findings between bioregions. Species were investigated ten times more frequently than ecosystems attributes, with mammals and birds monopolizing scientistsí attention. These findings show that our knowledge of biodiversity at bioregional scales is patchy, even for well-studied taxa, and that we have a limited understanding of the synthetic relationship between biodiversity and IBRA bioregions (which are demarcated according to other biophysical factors). This creates a barrier for systematic conservation planning, which requires unbiased information on the spatial attributes of biodiversity, and therefore this knowledge deficit warrants more attention.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:bioregionalization, terrestrial biodiversity, Australia, Interim Biogeographic Regionalization for Australia (IBRA), systematic map
Research Division:Environmental Sciences
Research Group:Environmental management
Research Field:Environmental management
Objective Division:Environmental Management
Objective Group:Management of Antarctic and Southern Ocean environments
Objective Field:Assessment and management of Antarctic and Southern Ocean ecosystems
UTAS Author:Montalvo-Mancheno, CS (Mr Cristian Montalvo-Mancheno)
UTAS Author:Ondei, S (Dr Stefania Ondei)
UTAS Author:Brook, BW (Professor Barry Brook)
UTAS Author:Buettel, JC (Dr Jessie Buettel)
ID Code:136338
Year Published:2019
Web of Science® Times Cited:1
Deposited By:Plant Science
Deposited On:2019-12-16
Last Modified:2020-09-18
Downloads:1 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page