eCite Digital Repository

Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse (Review)


Hunt, GE and Siegfried, N and Morley, K and Brooke-Sumner, C and Cleary, M, Psychosocial interventions for people with both severe mental illness and substance misuse (Review), Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, (12) Article CD001088. ISSN 1469-493X (2019) [Refereed Article]


Copyright Statement

Copyright 2019 The Cochrane Collaboration. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

DOI: doi:10.1002/14651858.CD001088.pub4


Background: Even low levels of substance misuse by people with a severe mental illness can have detrimental effects.

Objectives: To assess the effects of psychosocial interventions for reduction in substance use in people with a serious mental illness compared with standard care.

Search methods: The Information Specialist of the Cochrane Schizophrenia Group (CSG) searched the CSG Trials Register (2 May 2018), which is based on regular searches of major medical and scientific databases.

Selection criteria: We included all randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing psychosocial interventions for substance misuse with standard care in people with serious mental illness.

Data collection and analysis: Review authors independently selected studies, extracted data and appraised study quality. For binary outcomes, we calculated standard estimates of risk ratio (RR) and their 95% confidence intervals (CIs) on an intention-to-treat basis. For continuous outcomes, we calculated the mean difference (MD) between groups. Where meta-analyses were possible, we pooled data using a random-effects model. Using the GRADE approach, we identified seven patient-centred outcomes and assessed the quality of evidence for these within each comparison.

Main results: Our review now includes 41 trials with a total of 4024 participants. We have identified nine comparisons within the included trials and present a summary of our main findings for seven of these below. We were unable to summarise many findings due to skewed data or because trials did not measure the outcome of interest. In general, evidence was rated as low- or very-low quality due to high or unclear risks of bias because of poor trial methods, or inadequately reported methods, and imprecision due to small sample sizes, low event rates and wide confidence intervals.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:psychosocial interventions, severe mental illness, substance misuse
Research Division:Health Sciences
Research Group:Health services and systems
Research Field:Mental health services
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Provision of health and support services
Objective Field:Mental health services
UTAS Author:Cleary, M (Professor Michelle Cleary)
ID Code:136299
Year Published:2019
Web of Science® Times Cited:24
Deposited By:Nursing
Deposited On:2019-12-13
Last Modified:2020-09-21
Downloads:16 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page