eCite Digital Repository

Comparing sustainability claims with assurance in organic agriculture standards

Citation

Ascui, F and Farmery, AK and Gale, F, Comparing sustainability claims with assurance in organic agriculture standards, Australasian Journal of Environmental Management pp. 1-20. ISSN 1448-6563 (2019) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

© 2019 Environment Institute of Australia and New Zealand Inc.

DOI: doi:10.1080/14486563.2019.1682078

Abstract

Voluntary organic standard-setting organisations (SSOs) depend upon public trust in the truth claims implied by their labels: that the product in question has been produced using organic methods. They create and maintain this trust through assurance frameworks based on third-party verification of compliance with organic standards. It is therefore potentially problematic if an SSO makes additional claims that are not capable of being supported by their assurance frameworks. We investigate the claims made about the sustainability of organic agriculture by three voluntary organic SSOs, compared with assurance provisions within their standards. The analysis covers Australia, which has 53 per cent of the world's certified organic farmland; and is extended internationally by including the IFOAM standard, with which a further 49 organic standards are affiliated worldwide. We find that while these standards generally contain principles and requirements that support sustainability claims, they lack well-specified means of verification in most cases other than the ‘core’ claims to exclude synthetic chemical inputs and genetically modified organisms. This assurance gap creates the risk of a consumer backlash. We discuss two ways to mitigate this risk: by strengthening verification within standards; and/or by employing new agricultural information and communication technologies to support claims outside the certification process.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:organic agriculture, standards, sustainability claims, assurance, verification, certification
Research Division:Studies in Human Society
Research Group:Political Science
Research Field:Environmental Politics
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Community Service (excl. Work)
Objective Field:Environmental Services
UTAS Author:Ascui, F (Dr Francisco Ascui)
UTAS Author:Gale, F (Professor Fred Gale)
ID Code:136104
Year Published:2019
Deposited By:Office of the School of Social Sciences
Deposited On:2019-11-30
Last Modified:2020-03-30
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page