File(s) under permanent embargo
“Offensiphobia' is a red herring: on the problem of censorship and academic freedom
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 07:59 authored by Cross, B, Louise Richardson-SelfLouise Richardson-SelfIn a recent article, J. Angelo Corlett criticises what he takes to be the ‘offensiphobic’ practices characteristic of many universities. The ‘offensiphobe’, according to Corlett, believes that offensive speech ought to be censured precisely because it offends. We argue that there are three serious problems with Corlett’s discussion. First, his criticism of ‘offensiphobia’ misrepresents the kinds of censorship practiced by universities; many universities may in some way censure speech which they regard as offensive, but this is seldom if ever a manifestation of ‘offensiphobia’. Second, we attempt to reconstruct Corlett’s criticism of ‘offensiphobia’ as a criticism of the practice of censuring hate speech, and show that this argument is unsuccessful. Third, we offer some brief reflections on how labelling universities as ‘offensiphobic’ is especially problematic in light of the current climate of political interference in university research and teaching.
Funding
Australian Research Council
History
Publication title
The Journal of EthicsVolume
24Pagination
31-54ISSN
1382-4554Department/School
School of HumanitiesPublisher
Springer NetherlandsPlace of publication
NetherlandsRights statement
Copyright 2019 Springer Nature B.V.Repository Status
- Restricted