University of Tasmania
Browse
135243 - Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing.pdf (853.54 kB)

Comparison of the microbial population in rabbits and guinea pigs by next generation sequencing

Download (853.54 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 07:32 authored by Crowley, EJ, King, JM, Wilkinson, T, Worgan, HJ, Huson, KM, Michael RoseMichael Rose, McEwan, NR
This study aimed to determine the microbial composition of faeces from two groups of caecotrophagic animals; rabbits and guinea pigs. In addition the study aimed to determine the community present in the different organs in the rabbit. DNA was extracted from seven of the organs in wild rabbits (n = 5) and from faecal samples from domesticated rabbits (n = 6) and guinea pigs (n = 6). Partial regions of the small ribosomal sub-unit were amplified by PCR and then the sequences present in each sample were determined by next generation sequencing. Differences were detected between samples from rabbit and guinea pig faeces, suggesting that there is not a microbial community common to caecotrophagic animals. Differences were also detected in the different regions of the rabbits' digestive tracts. As with previous work, many of the organisms detected were Firmicutes or unclassified species and there was a lack of Fibrobacteres, but for the first time we observed a high number of Bacteroidetes in rabbit samples. This work re-iterates high levels of Firmicutes and unclassified species are present in the rabbit gut, together with low number of Fibrobacteres. This suggests that in the rabbit gut, organisms other than the Fibrobacteres must be responsible for fibre digestion. However observation of high numbers of Bacteroidetes suggests that this phylum may indeed have a role to play in digestion in the rabbit gut. © 2017 Crowley et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

History

Publication title

PLoS ONE

Volume

12

Article number

165779

Number

165779

Pagination

1-14

ISSN

1932-6203

Department/School

Tasmanian Institute of Agriculture (TIA)

Publisher

Public Library of Science

Place of publication

United States

Rights statement

Copyright 2017 Crowley et al. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International (CC BY 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Repository Status

  • Open

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in the biological sciences

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC