eCite Digital Repository

Accuracy of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction measurements by contemporary three-dimensional echocardiography with semi- and fully automated software: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,881 subjects

Citation

Kitano, T and Nabeshima, Y and Otsuji, Y and Negishi, K and Takeuchi, M, Accuracy of left ventricular volumes and ejection fraction measurements by contemporary three-dimensional echocardiography with semi- and fully automated software: Systematic review and meta-analysis of 1,881 subjects, Journal of the American Society of Echocardiography pp. 1-11. ISSN 0894-7317 (2019) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2019 American Society of Echocardiography

DOI: doi:10.1016/j.echo.2019.04.417

Abstract

Background: Although left ventricular (LV) quantification software for transthoracic three-dimensional echocardiography (3DE) have been steadily advancing, the measurement accuracy of semiautomated and fully automated software has not been systematically investigated.

Methods: We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis following a search of the PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for studies that directly compared LV volumes and ejection fraction (EF) using 3DE with ultrasound machines manufactured by one of the four manufacturers with either semiautomated (n = 4) or fully automated software (n = 2) and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) during the period from January 1, 2011, to July 23, 2018. A random effects model was used to determine the bias and 95% CI of LV end-diastolic volume (EDV), end-systolic volume (ESV), and EF. A metaregression and subgroup analysis were performed to investigate intersoftware variabilities.

Results: Of a total of 38 studies (1,881 subjects), the pooled bias and 95% CI for EDV, ESV, and EF of semiautomated software were -39.3 mL (-49.2 to -29.5 mL, P < .001), -19.6 mL (-25.9 to -13.3 mL, P < .001), and -0.6% (-2.0% to 0.7%, P = .360), respectively. The corresponding values for fully automated software were -14.5 mL (-25.7 to -3.3 mL, P = .011), -6.3 mL (-11.4 to -1.2 mL, P = .016), and -1.1% (-3.5% to 1.3%, P = .356) compared with CMR. The EDV and ESV biases for 3DE and CMR became significantly smaller and less heterogeneous when fully automated software was used. A metaregression analysis revealed that EDV bias became larger with an increase in EDV when semiautomated software was used but not when fully automated software was used.

Conclusions: Although 3DE still underestimates LV volumes, EF showed similar values to CMR for both types of software. The adoption of fully automated software could further improve measurement accuracy with fewer observer variabilities.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:ejection fraction, left ventricle, meta-analysis, three-dimensional echocardiography
Research Division:Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Research Field:Cardiology (incl. Cardiovascular Diseases)
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions)
Objective Field:Cardiovascular System and Diseases
UTAS Author:Negishi, K (Dr Kazuaki Negishi)
ID Code:133923
Year Published:2019
Web of Science® Times Cited:74
Deposited By:Menzies Institute for Medical Research
Deposited On:2019-07-16
Last Modified:2019-08-23
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page