University of Tasmania
Browse
133537 - Pitfalls in using eyewitness confidence to diagnose the accuracy of an individual identification decision (Author version).pdf (660.68 kB)

Pitfalls in using eyewitness confidence to diagnose the accuracy of an individual identification decision

Download (660.68 kB)
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-20, 05:02 authored by James SauerJames Sauer, Matthew PalmerMatthew Palmer, Brewer, N
Recently, a number of authors have made strong claims about the likely very high accuracy of identifications made with very high levels of confidence when identification testing conditions are pristine. We argue that although these strong claims about the confidence–accuracy relation are justifiable at the aggregate level, they may be misleading when attempting to evaluate the accuracy of an individual identification. First, we consider the recent evolution of conclusions drawn about the confidence–accuracy relationship, and the implications of these conclusions for the utility of confidence for evaluating individual identifications. Next, we highlight factors that may undermine the generalizability of conclusions at the aggregate level to individual cases. Finally, we present reanalyses of published data demonstrating conditions where conclusions based on aggregate data would be misleading for practitioners evaluating an individual identification. We maintain that, when appropriately collected, confidence can be a useful guide when assessing the reliability of identifications. However, we argue that when police and triers of fact attempt to evaluate the likely accuracy of an individual identification decision it will often be impossible to know if one of the key prerequisites for assessing whether a high confidence identification indicates an accurate identification - namely, a fair lineup - has been met.

History

Publication title

Psychology, Public Policy, and Law

Volume

25

Pagination

147-165

ISSN

1076-8971

Department/School

School of Psychological Sciences

Publisher

American Psychological Association

Place of publication

750 First St Ne, Washington, USA, Dc, 20002-4242

Rights statement

© 2019 American Psychological Association

Repository Status

  • Open

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in psychology

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC