Preview

PDF (Stephenson et al 2019 OCM) Pending copyright assessment - Request a copy 1Mb

Despite frequent calls for Integrated Management (IM) of coastal and marine activities, there is no consensus on the ‘recipe’ for successful adoption and implementation, and there has been insufficient evaluation of successes and failures of IM to date. The primary rationale for IM is to overcome four major deficiencies of sector-based management: a) management of diverse activities by different agencies using different approaches, b) management generally focused on a subset of primarily ecological objectives that do not properly articulate or evaluate social, cultural, economic and institutional objectives, c) no mechanisms to evaluate or advise on tradeoffs among objectives of activities in relation to objectives and d) no mechanisms to evaluate the cumulative effects of all managed activities. To help overcome this gap in knowledge, here we draw on our collective experiences working in Australia and Canada to develop and articulate a framework to help guide the practical implementation and evaluation of IM, which we define as: ‘An approach that links (integrates) planning, decision making and management arrangements across sectors in a unified framework, to enable a more comprehensive view of sustainability and the consideration of cumulative effects and trade-offs.’

We argue that IM will be most easily and effectively achieved by linking and modifying existing sector-based plans in an overarching IM initiative that has nine key features: 1) Recognition of need for IM, 2) A shared vision by stakeholders and decision-makers for IM, 3) Appropriate legal and institutional frameworks for coordinated decision making, 4) Sufficient and effective processes for stakeholder engagement and participation, 5) A common and comprehensive set of operational objectives, 6) Explicit consideration of trade-offs and cumulative impacts, 7) Flexibility to adapt to changing conditions, 8) Processes for ongoing review and refinement, and 9) Effective resourcing, capacity, leadership and tools. Drawing on these features we then articulate a process for the implementation and evaluation of IM that recognises five phases: i) Preconditions and drivers of change, ii) Intentional design and institutional rearrangement, iii) Enablers and disablers iv) An implemented IM process, and v) Review of IM performance and modification. Combination of the nine features of IM with the five phases in IM development provides a framework for implementation and a lens for evaluation of IM processes. We suggest that this framework provides a guide to the appropriate design of practical IM, which will assist in overcoming the current management deficiencies and improve the sustainability of marine resources in the face of change.

Item Type:	Refereed Article
Keywords:	marine governance, marine spatial planning, ecosystem-based management, trade-offs, cumulative impacts, Canada, Australia
Research Division:	Studies in Human Society
Research Group:	Policy and Administration
Research Field:	Environment Policy
Objective Division:	Environment
Objective Group:	Ecosystem Assessment and Management
Objective Field:	Ecosystem Assessment and Management of Coastal and Estuarine Environments
UTAS Author:	Hobday, AJ (Dr Alistair Hobday)
UTAS Author:	Alexander, KA (Dr Karen Alexander)
UTAS Author:	Frusher, S (Professor Stewart Frusher)
UTAS Author:	Fudge, ME (Ms Maree Fudge)
UTAS Author:	Fulton, EA (Dr Elizabeth Fulton)
UTAS Author:	Haward, M (Professor Marcus Haward)
UTAS Author:	Macleod, C (Associate Professor Catriona MacLeod)
UTAS Author:	McDonald, Jan (Professor Jan McDonald)
UTAS Author:	Nash, KL (Dr Kirsty Nash)
UTAS Author:	Ogier, E (Dr Emily Ogier)
UTAS Author:	Pecl, GT (Professor Gretta Pecl)
UTAS Author:	Plaganyi, EE (Dr Eva Plaganyi-Lloyd)
UTAS Author:	van Putten, I (Dr Ingrid Van Putten)
ID Code:	132713
Year Published:	2019
Deposited By:	Oceans and Cryosphere
Deposited On:	2019-05-17
Last Modified:	2019-05-21
Downloads:	0