eCite Digital Repository

The reform challenge: Australian patent law and the emergence of 3D printing

Citation

Nielsen, J and Nicol, D, The reform challenge: Australian patent law and the emergence of 3D printing, 3D Printing and Beyond: Intellectual Property and Regulation, Edward Elgar Publishing, D Mendis, M Lemley and M Rimmer (ed), Cheltenham, United Kingdom, pp. 325-346. ISBN 978 1 78643 404 3 (2019) [Research Book Chapter]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2019 Dinusha Mendis, Mark Lemley and Matthew Rimmer

Official URL: https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/3d-printing-and-beyon...

Abstract

Australian patent law has been in a state of flux for almost two decades. Incrementally retrofitting patent law has been an inevitable consequence of technological developments that have brought into question its role in facilitating innovation. Originally conceived to stimulate local innov­ation, the role of patent law has changed over time, as has its capacity to adapt and continue to protect innovation in the face of vast and frequent technological developments.

The extent to which patent law enables socially beneficial innovation is questionable in the digital and biotechnological environments. Tradition­ally a protector of functional products within the realm of machines and manufacturing, patent law has become a broader vehicle for the protec­tion of informational and animate subject matter. Business methods, software and biological materials have been accepted as patentable subject matter across many jurisdictions. Policy- and law-makers have not found these developments easy to contend with. In the Australian context, for example, agencies at the legal / policy interface grapple to understand the social benefits and costs wrought by expansions in patentable subject matter into new areas of technology. The difficulty in identifying benefits has led to a call by the Australian Productivity Commission in its draft report on intellectual property (IP) arrangements to exclude business methods and software from patentability under the Patents Act 1990 (Cth) (the 'Patents Act'). Notably, this recommendation did not survive to the final report.

Item Details

Item Type:Research Book Chapter
Keywords:bioprinting, patents, copyright, 3D printing
Research Division:Law and Legal Studies
Research Group:Law
Research Field:Intellectual Property Law
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Other Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Field:Law, Politics and Community Services not elsewhere classified
UTAS Author:Nielsen, J (Associate Professor Jane Nielsen)
UTAS Author:Nicol, D (Professor Dianne Nicol)
ID Code:131908
Year Published:2019
Deposited By:Law
Deposited On:2019-04-11
Last Modified:2019-05-01
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page