eCite Digital Repository

In-situ sulfur isotope analysis of pyrite from the Pangjiahe gold deposit: Implications for variable sulfur sources in the north and south gold belt of the South Qinling orogen

Citation

Ma, J and Lu, X and Escolme, A and Li, S and Zhao, N and Cao, X and Zhang, L and Lu, F, In-situ sulfur isotope analysis of pyrite from the Pangjiahe gold deposit: Implications for variable sulfur sources in the north and south gold belt of the South Qinling orogen, Ore Geology Reviews, 98 pp. 38-61. ISSN 0169-1368 (2018) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V.

DOI: doi:10.1016/j.oregeorev.2018.05.013

Abstract

The sedimentary- and granite porphyry-hosted Pangjiahe gold deposit is located in the north belt of the South Qinling Orogen, with a proven reserve of 38 t Au at 6.3 g/t. A total of 26 samples, from various rock types and locations from the Panjiahe deposit, were taken in order to determine the paragenesis, sulfur source and absolute age of mineralization. Magmatic activities of ca. 240 Ma occurred around the whole study area, which is common in the northwest part of the West Qinling orogen. Field observations confirm that the emplacement of granite porphyry dykes is earlier than the gold mineralization, because they were both altered and mineralized. Moreover, post ore stage diabase dykes, which cut cross the ore bodies, display an age of ca. 220 Ma. Zircons from strongly mineralized granite porphyry samples show typical hydrothermal trace element characteristics. Theses zircons return a concordia age at ca. 230 Ma. Therefore, we infer that the ore-forming age of the Pangjiahe deposit is at ca. 230 Ma.

Optical microscopy, EMPA and LA-(MC)-ICPMS have been used to determine the physical and chemical features of pyrite. Five stages of pyrite have been identified in mineralized phyllite and granite porphyry rocks. Diagenetic pyrite in phyllite, Py1-P, displays a wide range of δ34S (−1.5% to +9.4%). The magmatic pyrite in the granite porphyry, Py1-G, display relatively narrow range of δ34S (+2% to +5%) consistent with magmatic sulfur. The main ore stage pyrite in both rocks, Py2 (Py2-P and Py2-G), is the most common sulfide in the deposit. Py2 grains predominantly show oscillatory zoning and either replace or overgrown the Py1-P and Py1-G, or occur as individual fine grains. Arsenopyrite is typically associated with Py2. Pyrite grains in late stage quartz (Qz) veins that cross cut phyllite and granite, Py-Qz, display weak oscillatory zoning. Native gold is commonly observed as inclusions in the Py-Qz grains or within/proximal to quartz veins. Py3 pyrite (Py3-P and Py3-G), which also belong to the later ore stage and can be distinguished by the native gold inclusions in them, all occur as the outer rims that overgrown or replace on Py2. The ore stage Py2, Apy, Py-Qz and Py3 have a similar narrow range in sulfur isotopic composition, from +8% to +10%. This range is slightly lower than the age equivalent SEDEX Pb-Zn deposits situated in graben basins to the East, but totally different from the earlier Py1-P and Py1-G. EMPA element mapping and spot analyses, and in-situ sulfur isotope analyses indicate that the ore stage pyrites in both phyllite and granite rocks have similar major element chemistry and sulfur isotopic composition, indicating that they are likely sourced from the same ore fluids. Therefore, we propose that prograde metamorphism of the underlying Devonian sedimentary sequences during the seafloor exhalation, which are thought to be enriched in Au, As, Sb, B, F and S, may have released H2S that forming these auriferous sulfides.

Gold mineralization in the south belt of the South Qinling orogen shows the same mineralization style as observed in the North belt. However, mineralization is younger and the δ34S values of the hydrothermal ore stage sulfide are consistent with magmatic sulfur, which is consistent with intense magmatic activities within the South Qinling orogen. The δ34S values in the South Belt are distinctly different from those of gold deposits in the north belt. We propose that the source of the sulfur and gold in north belt came from the Devonian graben basins, and in the south belt came from a deep magmatic source. More focused studies of the gold and Devonian graben basin hosted SEDEX Pb-Zn deposits are required to further prove or develop this hypothesis.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:pyrite, sulfur isotope, Qinling orogen, Pangjiahe golddeposit, sedimentary and magmatic rock hosted
Research Division:Earth Sciences
Research Group:Geology
Research Field:Ore Deposit Petrology
Objective Division:Mineral Resources (excl. Energy Resources)
Objective Group:Mineral Exploration
Objective Field:Precious (Noble) Metal Ore Exploration
UTAS Author:Ma, J (Mr Jian Ma)
UTAS Author:Escolme, A (Dr Angela Escolme)
UTAS Author:Zhang, L (Dr Lejun Zhang)
ID Code:130861
Year Published:2018
Web of Science® Times Cited:4
Deposited By:CODES ARC
Deposited On:2019-02-18
Last Modified:2019-05-14
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page