eCite Digital Repository
An Australian perspective on rewilding
Citation
Sweeney, OF and Turnbull, J and Jones, M and Letnic, M and Newsome, TM and Sharp, A, An Australian perspective on rewilding, Conservation Biology, 33, (4) pp. 812-820. ISSN 0888-8892 (2019) [Refereed Article]
 | PDF 868Kb |
Copyright Statement
Copyright 2019 Society for Conservation Biology. This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Rewilding : an Australian perspective, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13280. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions.
Abstract
Rewilding is increasingly recognized as a conservation tool but is often context specific, which inhibits broad application. Rewilding in Australia seeks to enhance ecosystem function and promote self‐sustaining ecosystems. An absence of large‐bodied native herbivores means trophic rewilding in mainland Australia has focused on the restoration of functions provided by apex predators and small mammals. Because of the pervasive influence of introduced mesopredators, predator‐proof fences, and establishment of populations on predator‐free islands are common rewilding approaches. This sets Australian rewilding apart from most jurisdictions and provides globally relevant insights but presents challenges to restoring function to broader landscapes. Passive rewilding is of limited utility in arid zones. Although increasing habitat extent and quality in mesic coastal areas may work, it will likely be necessary to undertake active management. Because much of Australia's population is in urban areas, rewilding efforts must include urban areas to maximize effectiveness. Thus rewilding is not synonymous with wilderness and can occur over multiple scales. Rewilding efforts must recognize human effects on other species and benefit both nature and humans. Rewilding in Australia requires development of a shared vision and strategy and proof‐of‐concept projects to demonstrate the benefits. The repackaging of existing conservation activities as rewilding may confuse and undermine the success of rewilding programs and should be avoided. As elsewhere, rewilding in Australia should be viewed as an important conservation tool.
Item Details
| Item Type: | Refereed Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | apex predator, conservation fencing, critical weight range mammals, ecosystem function, keystone species, nature-based solutions, people and conservation, policy, rewilding, ecological restoration, Australia |
| Research Division: | Biological Sciences |
| Research Group: | Ecology |
| Research Field: | Community ecology (excl. invasive species ecology) |
| Objective Division: | Environmental Management |
| Objective Group: | Management of Antarctic and Southern Ocean environments |
| Objective Field: | Assessment and management of Antarctic and Southern Ocean ecosystems |
| UTAS Author: | Jones, M (Professor Menna Jones) |
| ID Code: | 130304 |
| Year Published: | 2019 |
| Funding Support: | Australian Research Council (LP130100949) |
| Web of Science® Times Cited: | 5 |
| Deposited By: | Zoology |
| Deposited On: | 2019-01-18 |
| Last Modified: | 2020-12-18 |
| Downloads: | 48 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page