File(s) under permanent embargo
Direct comparison of severity grading assessed by two-dimensional, three-dimensional, and doppler echocardiography for predicting prognosis in asymptomatic aortic stenosis
Methods: We prospectively enrolled 359 patients with asymptomatic AS. SV was determined using three methods, and the patients were divided into four AS subgroups according to indexed aortic valve area (iAVA) and SV index (SVI) determined by each method and mean pressure gradient. The primary end point was major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs), which included cardiac death, ventricular fibrillation, heart failure, and aortic valve replacement. We also assessed the presence or absence of upper septal hypertrophy.
Results: Doppler-derived SVI was significantly larger than that derived from 2DE/3DE with modest correlations (r = 0.33 and 0.47). Thus, group classification varied substantially by modality. During the median follow-up period of 17 months, 112 patients developed a major adverse cardiovascular event. Although iAVA assessed by Doppler echocardiography had a significantly better net reclassification improvement compared with iAVA by 2DE or 3DE, prognostic values were nearly identical among the three methods. Ventricular septal geometry affected the accuracy of risk stratification.
Conclusions: AS severity grading varied considerably according to the methods applied for calculating SV. Thus, SV measurements are not interchangeable, even though their prognostic power is similar. Hence, examiners should select one of the three methods to assess AS severity and should use the same method in longitudinal examinations.
History
Publication title
Journal of the American Society of EchocardiographyVolume
31Issue
10Pagination
1080-1090ISSN
0894-7317Department/School
Menzies Institute for Medical ResearchPublisher
MosbyPlace of publication
Inc, 11830 Westline Industrial Dr, St Louis, USA, Mo, 63146-3318Rights statement
Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Echocardiography.Repository Status
- Restricted