eCite Digital Repository
Spur pruning leads to distinctly different phenolic profiles of base sparkling wines than cane pruning
Citation
Jones, JE and Kerslake, FL and Dambergs, RG and Close, DC, Spur pruning leads to distinctly different phenolic profiles of base sparkling wines than cane pruning, Vitis, 57 pp. 103-109. ISSN 0042-7500 (2018) [Refereed Article]
 | PDF 946Kb |
Copyright Statement
Copyright 2018 the authors. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA 4.0) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
DOI: doi:10.5073/vitis.2018.57.103-109
Abstract
Winter pruning is the principal method for regulating yield in viticulture. The aim of this work was to investigate the effectiveness of cane and spur pruning on yield, and on grape and wine composition. Cane and spur pruning were investigated in Vitis vinifera L. 'Pinot noir' and 'Chardonnay' vertically-shoot-positioned vines over three seasons. Effects on vine carbohydrates, yield components, leaf area, grape and base wine composition were determined. The canopies of spur pruned vines established more rapidly than cane pruned vines in the 2009/10 season, for both 'Pinot noir' and 'Chardonnay'. The canopies were denser under spur pruning than cane pruning. Pruning treatment had no effect on total yield for either cultivar in any of the three seasons. Total soluble solids (TSS) and titratable acidity were unaffected by pruning treatment, except in 2012 where TSS and pH were higher for spur pruned 'Chardonnay' vines. Apart from spur pruned 'Pinot noir' vine wood being higher in starch in the winter of 2011, overwintering starch and soluble sugar concentrations were not different between pruning treatments for 'Pinot noir' and 'Chardonnay'. Although not different in yield or basic fruit composition, fruit from spur pruned vines resulted in distinctly different phenolic profiles of base wines, with cane pruning appearing to negatively impact on the low molecular weight phenolics in the wine. The results presented here provide confidence that quality is not lessened, in fact could be improved, by shifting from the industry norm of cane to spur pruning for sparkling wine production in cool climates.
Item Details
| Item Type: | Refereed Article |
|---|---|
| Keywords: | vitis vinifera, pruning, sparkling wine quality, yield, carbohydrates |
| Research Division: | Agricultural, Veterinary and Food Sciences |
| Research Group: | Horticultural production |
| Research Field: | Oenology and viticulture |
| Objective Division: | Plant Production and Plant Primary Products |
| Objective Group: | Industrial crops |
| Objective Field: | Wine grapes |
| UTAS Author: | Jones, JE (Dr Joanna Jones) |
| UTAS Author: | Kerslake, FL (Dr Fiona Kerslake) |
| UTAS Author: | Dambergs, RG (Dr Robert Dambergs) |
| UTAS Author: | Close, DC (Professor Dugald Close) |
| ID Code: | 128436 |
| Year Published: | 2018 |
| Web of Science® Times Cited: | 4 |
| Deposited By: | TIA - Research Institute |
| Deposited On: | 2018-09-21 |
| Last Modified: | 2019-03-21 |
| Downloads: | 60 View Download Statistics |
Repository Staff Only: item control page