File(s) under permanent embargo
Embracing Change When ‘Writing for Change’: My Ph.D. Journey
What is an appropriate structure for reporting a study that sought to understand and interpret the valued language choices in the highest scoring persuasive texts written by Tasmanian primary and secondary school students for the 2011 NAPLAN writing test, and to critique the impact of such high-stakes, standardised testing on Australian primary and secondary school teachers’ persuasive writing instruction, straddling between positivist, interpretivist and critical paradigms, and adopting qualitative research?
History
Publication title
Structuring the Thesis: Matching Method, Paradigm, Theories and FindingsEditors
D Kember, M CorbettPagination
207-216ISBN
978-981-13-0510-8Department/School
Faculty of EducationPublisher
Springer Nature Singapore Pte LtdPlace of publication
SingaporeExtent
40Rights statement
Copyright 2018 Springer Nature Singapore Pte Ltd. 2018Repository Status
- Restricted