University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Evaluation of biological and technical variations in low-input RNA-Seq and single-cell RNA-Seq

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-22, 05:46 authored by Gao, F, Kim, JM, Kim, J, Lin, M-Y, Liu, CY, Russin, JJ, Walker, CP, Dominguez, R, Camarena, A, Nguyen, JD, Herstein, J, Mack, W, Evgrafov, OV, Chow, RH, Knowles, JA, Wang, K
Copyright © 2018 Inderscience Enterprises Ltd. Background: Low-input or single-cell RNA-Seq are widely used today, but two technical questions remain: 1) in technical replicates, what proportion of noises comes from input RNA quantity rather than variation of bioinformatics tools?; 2) In single neurons, whether variation in gene expression is attributable to biological heterogeneity or just random noise? To examine the sources of variability, we have generated RNA-Seq data from low-input (10/100/1000pg) reference RNA samples and 38 single neurons from human brains. Results: For technical replicates, the quantity of input RNA is negatively correlated with expression variation. For genes in the medium- and high-expression groups, input RNA amount explains most of the variation, whereas bioinformatic pipelines explain some variation for the low-expression group. The t-distributed stochastic neighbour embedding (t-SNE) method reveals data-inherent aggregation of low-input replicate data, and suggests heterogeneity of single pyramidal neuron transcriptome. Interestingly, expression variation in single neurons is biologically relevant. Conclusions: We found that differences in bioinformatics pipelines do not present a major source of variation.

History

Publication title

International Journal of Computational Biology and Drug Design

Volume

11

Issue

1/2

ISSN

1756-0756

Department/School

Tasmanian School of Medicine

Publisher

Inderscience Publishers

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in the biological sciences