University of Tasmania
Browse

File(s) under permanent embargo

Formalized procedure for ranking alternatives in developing environmental programs

journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-19, 20:44 authored by Kiril TenekedjievKiril Tenekedjiev, Kamenova, S, Nataliya NikolovaNataliya Nikolova
Different institutions for many of reasons develop environmental programs. Many aspects are taken into consideration in order to make alternative decisions that concern them. Environmental decision makers usually use experts’ opinion on the subject, and in any case they must conform to the strict development requirements and the specific features of the situation at hand. In this paper, a formalized approach towards expert panel subjective opinion processing is presented, which allows a criteria hierarchy to be structured and different environmental program alternatives to be ranked taking into consideration not only the total marginal indicators, but also their deviation with the use of the Bootstrap modification of the Monte Carlo computer intensive simulation method. Developed procedure, called REPOMP (Randomized Expert Panel Opinion Marginalizing Procedure) is applied in order to estimate two alternative technologies for waste treatment. Because it is generic, REPOMP can be used for solving a wide range of problems that envisage similar input data structure.

History

Publication title

The Journal of Cleaner Production

Volume

12

Issue

4

Pagination

353-360

ISSN

0959-6526

Department/School

Australian Maritime College

Publisher

Elsevier Sci Ltd

Place of publication

United Kingdom

Rights statement

Copyright 2003 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Repository Status

  • Restricted

Socio-economic Objectives

Expanding knowledge in the information and computing sciences

Usage metrics

    University Of Tasmania

    Exports

    RefWorks
    BibTeX
    Ref. manager
    Endnote
    DataCite
    NLM
    DC