eCite Digital Repository

Boundary spanning at the science–policy interface: the practitioners’ perspectives


Bednarek, AT and Wyborn, C and Cvitanovic, C and Meyer, R and Colvin, RM and Addison, PFE and Close, SL and Curran, K and Farooque, M and Goldman, E and Hart, D and Mannix, H and McGreavy, B and Parris, A and Posner, S and Robinson, C and Ryan, M and Leith, P, Boundary spanning at the science-policy interface: the practitioners' perspectives, Sustainability Science, 13, (4) pp. 1175-1183. ISSN 1862-4065 (2018) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2018 The Authors

DOI: doi:10.1007/s11625-018-0550-9


Cultivating a more dynamic relationship between science and policy is essential for responding to complex social challenges such as sustainability. One approach to doing so is to "span the boundaries" between science and decision making and create a more comprehensive and inclusive knowledge exchange process. The exact definition and role of boundary spanning, however, can be nebulous. Indeed, boundary spanning often gets conflated and confused with other approaches to connecting science and policy, such as science communication, applied science, and advocacy, which can hinder progress in the field of boundary spanning. To help overcome this, in this perspective, we present the outcomes from a recent workshop of boundary-spanning practitioners gathered to (1) articulate a definition of what it means to work at this interface ("boundary spanning") and the types of activities it encompasses; (2) present a value proposition of these efforts to build better relationships between science and policy; and (3) identify opportunities to more effectively mainstream boundary-spanning activities. Drawing on our collective experiences, we suggest that boundary spanning has the potential to increase the efficiency by which useful research is produced, foster the capacity to absorb new evidence and perspectives into sustainability decision-making, enhance research relevance for societal challenges, and open new policy windows. We provide examples from our work that illustrate this potential. By offering these propositions for the value of boundary spanning, we hope to encourage a more robust discussion of how to achieve evidence-informed decision-making for sustainability.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:boundary spanning, boundary organizations, science-policy interface, wicked problems, sustainability
Research Division:Human Society
Research Group:Policy and administration
Research Field:Environment policy
Objective Division:Environmental Management
Objective Group:Coastal and estuarine systems and management
Objective Field:Assessment and management of coastal and estuarine ecosystems
UTAS Author:Cvitanovic, C (Dr Christopher Cvitanovic)
UTAS Author:Leith, P (Dr Peat Leith)
ID Code:125275
Year Published:2018
Web of Science® Times Cited:14
Deposited By:Oceans and Cryosphere
Deposited On:2018-04-11
Last Modified:2019-12-03

Repository Staff Only: item control page