Relf, B and Crawford, N and O'Rourke, J and Sharp, S and Hodges, B and Shah, M and Katersky Barnes, R, Lighting the path(way): articulating curriculum design principles for open access enabling programs, Lighting the path(way): articulating curriculum design principles for open access enabling programs, Australian Government Department of Education and Training, Australia (2017) [Report Other]
Official URL: http://www.olt.gov.au/project-lighting-pathway-art...
Enabling programs provide an effective and important pathway to higher education for students from disadvantaged backgrounds and target equity groups. They allow access to higher education for students who lack standard qualifications for entry and equip them with knowledge, skills and attitudes conducive to success in their first year of undergraduate studies. However, little is known about the conceptual frameworks for curriculum design for these programs. This project aimed to increase understanding of enabling curricula by:
2. articulating guiding principles that underlie curriculum design in these enabling programs
3. in light of these principles, facilitating the development of a strategic discussion on good practice in enabling curriculum design at a national level.
The project team examined the curriculum design approaches of one open access enabling program from each participating institution: the Open Foundation Program of The University of Newcastle, the University Preparation Program of the University of Tasmania and the UniPrep program of Edith Cowan University. These three programs represent the diversity of open access programs in Australia, with one having a discipline-specific focus (The University of Newcastle), the second having a focus on academic literacies and preparation (University of Tasmania), and the third having a combination of the two (Edith Cowan University). Each participating program was designed in response to its local context; different historical factors shaped the development of each program.
‘Curriculum’ is a complex and often misunderstood concept. This study works with a four-fold understanding of ‘curriculum’ comprising: the intended curriculum, the documented program information such as subject outlines; the enacted curriculum, what educators teach; the experienced curriculum, what students learn; and, weaving through them all, the hidden curriculum, the norms, values and beliefs associated with education.
|Item Type:||Report Other|
|Keywords:||curriculum design, enabling education, tertiary preparation programs, widening participation, equity|
|Research Group:||Curriculum and pedagogy|
|Research Field:||Curriculum and pedagogy not elsewhere classified|
|Objective Division:||Education and Training|
|Objective Group:||Teaching and curriculum|
|Objective Field:||Teaching and curriculum not elsewhere classified|
|UTAS Author:||Crawford, N (Dr Nicole Crawford)|
|UTAS Author:||Katersky Barnes, R (Dr Robin Katersky Barnes)|
|Deposited By:||ED Student Life and Enrichment|
Repository Staff Only: item control page