File(s) under permanent embargo
STEM: Silver bullet for a viable future or just more flatland?
journal contribution
posted on 2023-05-19, 16:58 authored by Caroline SmithCaroline Smith, Jane WatsonJane WatsonThis article explores contentious issues that arise from unproblematised calls for STEM (the disciplines of Science, Mathematics, Engineering and Technology) to provide innovative solutions to two existential problems of the 21st century: employment and environmental sustainability. We situate STEM as a neoliberal construct within a hypermodernist techno-optimist future, a manifestation of Wilber’s “flatland”. We argue that while STEM undoubtedly plays an important role into the future, rather than being taken at face value as an unexamined good, its taken-forgranted but contradictory role is naïve and misplaced and must be subject to serious critique. We argue that in its current conceptualisation, STEM’s role is inherently unable to provide the sustainability of future employment in a knowledge-based economy. We question the enthusiastic promotion of STEM as key contributor to an environmentally sustainable future as we enter the epoch of the Anthropocene, and examine the role of STEM education, in contrast to Education for Sustainability (EfS). We conclude that STEM and STEM education need to include critical and futures perspectives in order to align more fully with a flourishing economic, social and environmental future.
History
Publication title
Journal of Futures StudiesVolume
22Issue
4Pagination
25-44ISSN
1027-6084Department/School
Faculty of EducationPublisher
Tamkang University Graduate Institute of Futures StudiesPlace of publication
Taiwan, Republic of ChinaRights statement
Copyright 2018 Tamkang University Graduate Institute of Futures StudiesRepository Status
- Restricted