eCite Digital Repository

Community interpretersí experiences of police investigative interviews: how might interpretersí insights contribute to enhanced procedural justice?

Citation

Howes, LM, Community interpreters' experiences of police investigative interviews: how might interpreters' insights contribute to enhanced procedural justice?, Policing and Society, 29, (8) pp. 887-905. ISSN 1043-9463 (2019) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2018 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group

DOI: doi:10.1080/10439463.2018.1447572

Abstract

Procedural justice refers to fairness in police dealings with members of the public. By facilitating communication between the police and people with whom they do not share a common language, interpreters assist policing organisations to provide fair and equitable services for all members of the community. Yet research findings suggest that interpretersí presence, behaviour, and interpreting choices can negatively impact the fairness of police investigative interviews. To contribute to enhanced procedural justice in interpreted investigative interviews, this study explores the under-researched topic of interpretersí perceptions of such interviews. Twenty community interpreters from diverse languages participated in interviews, in line with the procedural justice concept of voice. Inductive thematic analysis of transcripts revealed interpretersí perception that effective interpreting is impeded both by systemic issues arising from the structure of the interpreting profession and situational aspects of the police interview. Interpretersí accounts urged police interviewers to develop familiarity with this developing profession and elaborated on what is helpful to them in interpreted police interviews whether on site or via telephone. Practical strategies for police interviewers to assist interpreters include familiarising them with interview rooms, giving advance briefings to prepare for emotional content, allowing time to check infrequently used words, and debriefing at the conclusion. Overall, the findings indicate some practical ways in which the procedural justice goals of neutrality, respectful treatment, and trustworthiness may be enhanced in interpreted investigative interviews. Further research is needed to assess the impacts of these suggestions on procedural justice outcomes in practice.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:legal interpreting, police interviews, procedural justice, public service interpreting
Research Division:Studies in Human Society
Research Group:Criminology
Research Field:Police Administration, Procedures and Practice
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Justice and the Law
Objective Field:Criminal Justice
UTAS Author:Howes, LM (Dr Loene Howes)
ID Code:124837
Year Published:2019 (online first 2018)
Web of Science® Times Cited:2
Deposited By:Office of the School of Social Sciences
Deposited On:2018-03-14
Last Modified:2020-03-27
Downloads:0

Repository Staff Only: item control page