eCite Digital Repository

Improving discharge care: The potential of a new organisational intervention to improve discharge after hospitalisation for acute stroke, a controlled before-after pilot study

Citation

Cadilhac, DA and Andrew, NE and Stroil Salama, E and Hill, K and Middleton, S and Horton, E and Meade, I and Kuhle, S and Nelson, MR and Grimley, R, On behalf of the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry Consortium, Improving discharge care: The potential of a new organisational intervention to improve discharge after hospitalisation for acute stroke, a controlled before-after pilot study, BMJ Open, 7, (8) Article e016010. ISSN 2044-6055 (2017) [Refereed Article]


Preview
PDF
934Kb
  

Copyright Statement

Article author(s) 2017. Licensed under Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/)

Official URL: http://bmjopen.bmj.com/content/7/8/e016010

DOI: doi:10.1136/ bmjopen-2017-016010

Abstract

Objective: Provision of a discharge care plan and prevention therapies is often suboptimal. Our objective was to design and pilot test an interdisciplinary, organisational intervention to improve discharge care using stroke as the case study using a mixed-methods, controlled before-after observational study design.

Setting: Acute care public hospitals in Queensland, Australia (n=15). The 15 hospitals were ranked against a benchmark based on a composite outcome of three discharge care processes. Clinicians from a 'top-ranked' hospital participated in a focus group to elicit their success factors. Two pilot hospitals then participated in the organisational intervention that was designed with experts and consumers.

Participants: Hospital clinicians involved in discharge care for stroke and patients admitted with acute stroke or transient ischaemic attack.

Intervention: A four-stage, multifaceted organisational intervention that included data reviews, education and facilitated action planning.

Primary and Secondary Outcome Measures: Three discharge processes collected in Queensland hospitals within the Australian Stroke Clinical Registry were used to select study hospitals: (1) discharge care plan; (2) antihypertensive medication prescription and (3) antiplatelet medication prescription (ischaemic events only). Primary measure: composite outcome. Secondary measures: individual adherence changes for each discharge process; sensitivity analyses. The performance outcomes were compared 3 months before the intervention (preintervention), 3 months postintervention and at 12 months (sustainability).

Results: Data from 1289 episodes of care from the two pilot hospitals were analysed. Improvements from preintervention adherence were: antiplatelet therapy (88%vs96%, p=0.02); antihypertensive prescription (61%vs79%, p<0.001); discharge planning (72%vs94%, p<0.001); composite outcome (73%vs89%, p<0.001). There was an insignificant decay effect over the 12-month sustainability period (composite outcome: 89% postintervention vs 85% sustainability period, p=0.08).

Conclusion: Discharge care in hospitals may be effectively improved and sustained through a staged and peer-informed, organisational intervention. The intervention warrants further application and trialling on a larger scale.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:change management, clinical audit, quality in health care, stroke
Research Division:Medical and Health Sciences
Research Group:Cardiorespiratory Medicine and Haematology
Research Field:Cardiology (incl. Cardiovascular Diseases)
Objective Division:Health
Objective Group:Clinical Health (Organs, Diseases and Abnormal Conditions)
Objective Field:Cardiovascular System and Diseases
Author:Nelson, MR (Professor Mark Nelson)
ID Code:124554
Year Published:2017
Web of Science® Times Cited:1
Deposited By:Menzies Institute for Medical Research
Deposited On:2018-02-26
Last Modified:2018-07-20
Downloads:24 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page