Malau-Aduli, BS and Teague, P-A and D'Souza, K and Heal, C and Turner, R and Garne, DL and van der Vleuten, C, A collaborative comparison of objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) standard setting methods at Australian medical schools, Medical teacher, 39, (12) pp. 1261-1267. ISSN 0142-159X (2017) [Refereed Article]
Copyright 2017 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group
Background: A key issue underpinning the usefulness of the OSCE assessment to medical education is standard setting, but the majority of standard-setting methods remain challenging for performance assessment because they produce varying passing marks. Several studies have compared standard-setting methods; however, most of these studies are limited by their experimental scope, or use data on examinee performance at a single OSCE station or from a single medical school. This collaborative study between 10 Australian medical schools investigated the effect of standard-setting methods on OSCE cut scores and failure rates.
Methods: This research used 5256 examinee scores from seven shared OSCE stations to calculate cut scores and failure rates using two different compromise standard-setting methods, namely the Borderline Regression and Cohenís methods.
Results: The results of this study indicate that Cohenís method yields similar outcomes to the Borderline Regression method, particularly for large examinee cohort sizes. However, with lower examinee numbers on a station, the Borderline Regression method resulted in higher cut scores and larger difference margins in the failure rates.
Conclusion: Cohenís method yields similar outcomes as the Borderline Regression method and its application for benchmarking purposes and in resource-limited settings is justifiable, particularly with large examinee numbers.
|Item Type:||Refereed Article|
|Research Group:||Curriculum and pedagogy|
|Research Field:||Medicine, nursing and health curriculum and pedagogy|
|Objective Division:||Expanding Knowledge|
|Objective Group:||Expanding knowledge|
|Objective Field:||Expanding knowledge in the health sciences|
|UTAS Author:||Turner, R (Professor Richard Turner)|
|Web of Science® Times Cited:||5|
Repository Staff Only: item control page