eCite Digital Repository

The path to reducing duplication of human research ethics review in Australia


Johns, A and Nicol, D and Zeps, N and Chalmers, DRC, The path to reducing duplication of human research ethics review in Australia, Medicine and Law, 36, (1) pp. 7-22. ISSN 0723-1393 (2017) [Refereed Article]

Copyright Statement

Copyright 2017 World Association for Medical Law

Official URL:


The expansion of collaborative and data-intensive multicentre international research has intensified the need to reassess current national ethics re!view systems to ensure they both protect research participants and facilitate ethical research. Regarding the latter aim, this means ensuring that systems do not create unnecessary review barriers that may delay or even prevent important, ethical research. Australia and other jurisdictions recently have been revising their ethics review procedures and guidelines. However, many Australian Human Research Ethics Committees (HRECs) continue to undertake a full review of each research project undertaken at their home institution, irrespective of whether the project is stand-alone or multicentre. Australia has been addressing duplication in ethics review, but this remains a work-in-progress. Structural barriers created by state-based approaches to legislation and ethics review exacerbate the problem in the Australian context. Harmonisation of ethical review has not enjoyed sufficient resourcing or political support and moves ahead at a glacial pace. International cooperation and harmonisation of protocols through initiatives like the Global Alliance for Genomics and Health (GA-l-GH) provide a clear impetus to accelerate ethics review reform that aims to reduce duplicated review and recognise the equivalency of review of multi~centre research projects by another research ethics committee.

Item Details

Item Type:Refereed Article
Keywords:big data, data sharing, ethics review, genomics
Research Division:Law and Legal Studies
Research Group:Law in context
Research Field:Medical and health law
Objective Division:Law, Politics and Community Services
Objective Group:Justice and the law
Objective Field:Law reform
UTAS Author:Nicol, D (Professor Dianne Nicol)
UTAS Author:Chalmers, DRC (Professor Don Chalmers)
ID Code:124153
Year Published:2017
Web of Science® Times Cited:3
Deposited By:Law
Deposited On:2018-02-09
Last Modified:2018-08-28
Downloads:2 View Download Statistics

Repository Staff Only: item control page